期刊文献+

道法自然与诗意地栖居——两种天人观的比较

Tao Follows Nature and Poetic Habitation——A Comparison of two theories on heaven and man
下载PDF
导出
摘要 西方人传统的思维方式是主客对立、感性与理性相分裂,从古希腊苏格拉底的“知识即美德”开始,思想家们就把人与自然对立起来,认为自由就在于征服自然,与此同时,人们也陷入了困境。而中国古代哲人的思维方式则是主客不分,感性理性混杂,他们提出的“天人合一”的思维方式,对解决因科学主义的泛滥而导致的人类困境,无疑提供了某些思想素材。故二者在天人观上的观点有较大的差异。 The traditional way of western thinking is the subjective against the objective, sensibility separate with rationality. From the start of Socrates' “knowledge is virtue” , many thinkers contrast the nature with man and think that liberty lies in conquering the world. With these opinions people get into trouble. However ancient Chinese philosophers are sharing the subjective and objective, mixing the sensibility with rationality. In this way, they have put forward “syncretism of heave and man”, which offers good thinking materials in resolving the predicament of human for the overflow of scientism.
作者 尉利工
出处 《安徽教育学院学报》 2005年第5期6-9,共4页 Journal of Anhui Institute of Education
关键词 自然 天人合一 科学主义 Nature Tao syncretism of heave and man Scientism
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1[德]卡西尔.人论[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1985..
  • 2[德]伽达默尔.哲学解释学[M].上海:上海译文出版社,2004..

共引文献156

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部