期刊文献+

液相色谱-电喷雾串联质谱法测定食品中的伏马菌素 被引量:25

Determination of Fumonisin in Food by High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Electrospray Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometry
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过固相萃取富集伏马菌素,采用液相色谱-电喷雾串联质谱法测定玉米和芦笋中的伏马菌素B1(FB1)、伏马菌素B2(FB2).在最佳色谱条件下,伏马菌素B1、伏马菌素B2的保留时间分别为5.2 min 和8.8 min,样品空白无干扰.离子化技术采用电喷雾正离子方式,以多反应监测(MRM)方式进行检测.该法检出限为80 pg;线性定量范围为0.01~10mg/L;回收率为78.3%~104.9%;相对标准偏差为2.2%~14.2%.利用ESI/MS/MS对伏马菌素B1、伏马菌素B2进行了质谱解析,分别选择特征离子峰m/z 352、528和m/z 336、512作为伏马菌素B1、伏马菌素B2准确定性的依据.方法灵敏度高,选择性好,准确度高,可为食品中伏马菌素的风险评估提供灵敏、准确的分析方法. High performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (ESI/MS/MS) combining with solid phase extraction has been developed for the determination of fumonisin B1 (FB1 ) and fumonisin B2 (FB2 ) in corn and asparagus. The gradient program was used to obtain an optimal separation with mobile phase of MeOH:H2O:trifluoroacetic acid at 0. 8 mlMmin on a C8 column. The retention time of FB1 and FB2 were 5.2 min and 8.8 min, respectively. Ionization was performed in an electrospraypositive ion source ( + ) and quantitative detection was carried out using Multiple Reaction Monitor mode. The limit of detection was 80 pg and the linear range was from 0. 01 to 10 mg/L with recovery of 78.3% - 104. 9% and the RSD from 2.2 to 14.2%. Using the proposed ESI/MS/MS, FB1 and FB2 could be identified with both retention time and the typical ion peaks for FB1 at m/z 532 and 528 and FB2 at m/z 336, 512, respectively. The method was proved to be validated to analyze these two fumonisins from asparagus and corn samples.
出处 《分析化学》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第11期1619-1622,共4页 Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry
基金 中德科学基金研究交流中心资助项目(No.GZ051-7(151))
关键词 液相色谱-电喷雾串联质谱 伏马菌素 芦笋 玉米 串联质谱法 液相色谱 电喷雾 食品 测定 固相萃取富集 Liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry, fumonisin, asparagus,corn
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Gelderblom W C A,Marasas W F O. Carcinogenesis, 1988, 9: 1045~1049.
  • 2Pinkiro M S,Silva G E,Scott P M,Lawrence A L. J. AOAC. Int., 1997, 80: 825~828.
  • 3Nelson P E,Platter R D,Shackelford D D. Appl. Environ.. Microbiol., 1991, 57: 2410~2412.
  • 4Mallmann C A,Santurio J M, Almeida C A A. Arq. Inst. Biol. Sao. Paulo., 2001, 68: 41~45.
  • 5Marasas W F O,Keerman T S,Gelderblom W C A,Coetzer J A W,Thiel P,GLugt J J. J. Vet. Res., 1988, 55: 197~203.
  • 6Harrison L R,Colvin B M,Green J T,Newman L E,Cole J R. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest., 1990, 2: 217~221.
  • 7Sydenham E W,Thiel P G,Marasas W F O,Shephard G S,Van Schalkwijk D J,Koch K R. J. Agric. Food Chem., 1990, 38: 1900~1903.
  • 8Marin S,Magan N,Sorra J,Ramos A J,Canela R,Sanchis V. J. Food Sci., 1999, 64: 921~924.
  • 9Azcona L J I,Aborzied M M,Planttner R D D,Norred W P,Pestka J J. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1992, 58: 169~173.
  • 10Lukacs Z,Schaper S,Herderich M,Schreier P,Humpf H U. Chromatographia, 1996, 43(3/4): 124~128.

同被引文献891

引证文献25

二级引证文献227

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部