医疗纠纷医学会鉴定和法医学鉴定的比较研究

The Comparison and Research of Medical Malpractice's Expertise by Medical Association and Forensic Medicine

目的探讨医疗纠纷鉴定中,医学会鉴定和法医学鉴定两种形式之间的异同。方法调查两组分别由两种鉴定形式所鉴定的医疗纠纷案例,对材料进行回顾性研究,利用统计学方法分析比较。结果医学会鉴定和法医学鉴定两种鉴定形式在诸如男女比例、年龄及科室分布等许多方面存在共同点,但也有各自的鉴定特点。结论单纯以鉴定结果论,在医疗过失的认定上,医学会鉴定和法医鉴定并无太大的区别。

Objective To discuss the similarities and differences of Medical Association and forensic medicine in the expertise of medical malpractice. Methods To investigate the medical malpractice cases from the two different styles of expertise, that is Medical Association and forensic medicine, and research retrospectively on these cases.In the same time, analyze and compare them with statistic methods. Results These two styles of expertise of Medical Association and forensic medicine have many similarities, such as the proportion of men and women, the distributing of age and department of the hospital, etc.but they also have characteristics of themselves each other in medical malpractice＇s expertise. Conclusion If the expertise of Medical Association and forensic medicine are only analyzed in the result of expertise, there are not too many differences in the affirmation of medical negligence.