摘要
目的 :探讨OC及LC与Calot三角的关系。方法 :回顾分析 4 0 0 0例OC及 5 0 0例LC的临床资料。结果 :4 0 0 0例OC中发生胆囊动脉出血 2 0例 ,占 0 5 % ,门静脉损伤大出血 2例 ,占 0 0 5 % ,死亡 1例。胆道损伤 2例 ,占 0 0 5 %。 5 0 0例LC胆囊动脉出血 10例 ,占 2 % ,胆总管横断伤 1例 ,占 0 2 %。结论 :无论是OC或LC避免胆囊动脉出血、门静脉损伤大出血、胆道损伤 ,关键在于对Calot三角的正确解剖。
Objective: To investigate tile relationship of OC and LC with Calot triangle. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 4000 OC anti 500LC. Results: In 4000 OC, 20 eases had eholeeystie artery hemorrhage, about 0.5%, 2 had hemorrhage of portal injury, about 0.05%, and 1 dead. Two were injury of biliary tract, about 0.05%. In 500 LC, 10 had eholecvstie artelT hemorrhage, about 2% , and 1 had crosecut injury of common bile duet, about 0.2% . Conclusions: No matter OC and LC the accurate anatomy of the Calot triangle was the key to avoid hemorrhage of cholecystie artery and portal injury and biliary tract.
出处
《华西医学》
CAS
2005年第1期25-26,共2页
West China Medical Journal
关键词
OC及LC
CALOT三角
副损伤
Operation cholecysteetomy (OC) and Laparoseopy eholeeysteetomy (LC)
Calot triangle
Accessory injury