摘要
荣格和艾略特都在试图探寻艺术的奥秘。荣格发现了“集体无意识”和“原型”,而艾略特着意于历史精神和民族心灵;前者深入到了人类的潜意识,后者是从意识层面的历史文化入手,二者都认为文学应该是非个人化的。这种理论有合理的一面,但往往容易陷入绝对。文学是通过个人化的方式表达非个人化的情绪,非个人化的倾向使诗人的主观性得到更充分更完美的表达。
Both Jung and T. S. Eliot attempt to explore the profound mystery of art. Jung finds out “collective is unconsciousness” and “prototype”, while Eliot pays more attention to the historical spirit and national soul. Though both agree that literature should be personalized, the former explores human sub - consciousness, and the later proceeds with the history and culture of ideology. Their theory is reasonable to some degree, but it' s likely to lead to absoluteness. So the author holds that literature express the non -personalized ideas by personal ways and non -personalized tendency perfectly express the poet's ideas.
出处
《西安文理学院学报(社会科学版)》
2005年第5期18-21,共4页
Journal of Xi’an University(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
非个人化
荣格
艾略特
集体无意识
民族精神
Non - personalized
Jung
T. S. Eliot
Collective non - Consciousness
historical spirit