期刊文献+

语言与世界的结构全息——哲学与语言学共同关注语言行为的缘由 被引量:4

Structural Holography of Language and World:On a Shared Concern of Philosophy and Linguistics over Language Behavior
原文传递
导出
摘要 哲学的一个任务是认识人,哲学家对这一点是自觉的。语言学家也逐渐意识到,人类透过语言研究还可以反观自己、研究自己。哲学与语言学的经历表明,语言学与哲学,在透过语言认识人自身这一点上殊途同归。而这正是因为“语事”(以语言做事)与“行事”(以行为做事)是同源、同构、同质的,因而是全息的。 An undertaking of philosophy is the understanding of human beings, of which philosophers have always been self-conscious. Linguists have also come to the awareness of linguistic researching as a means of reflecting on and understanding human beings themselves. The development of philosophy and linguistics has shown that by different routes, linguistics and philosophy have reached the same point of endeavoring to understand human beings themselves via language analysis; and this is because “to talk things (to do things by language)” and “to do things (to do things by action)” are congenetic, isomorphic, consubstantial and, therefore, holographic.
出处 《外语学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第6期7-11,共5页 Foreign Language Research
关键词 哲学 语言学 语言行为 结构全息性 philosophy linguistics language behavior structural holography
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Austin, J.L., Performatives and Constatives[A] in Maria Baghramian 1999, Modern Philosophy of Language[C]. Counterpoint, Washington D.C., 1962.
  • 2Baghramian, M., Modern Philosophy of Language[C]. Counterpoint, Washington, D.C., 1999.
  • 3Bloomfield, L., 1955, 语言[M].北京:商务印书馆, 1980.
  • 4Chomsky, N., Language and Mina[M]. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., New York, 1972.
  • 5Lakoff, G. et al., Philosophy in the Flesh[M]. Basic Books, New York. ,1999.
  • 6Lakoff, G., NLG [ELW] http://www.icsi.berkeley.edu/NTL 2004.
  • 7Russell, B., History of Western Philosophy[M] . Simon and Schuster, Inc., New York, 1945.
  • 8Ryle, G., Ordinary Language[A], in V.C. Chappell, Ordinary Language[C]. Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey,1953.
  • 9Saussure F de.《普通语言学教程》[M].北京:商务印书馆,1980..
  • 10Schultz,D.P., A History of Modern Psychology[M]. Academic Press, Inc., New York,1969.

二级参考文献41

  • 1钱冠连.哲学轨道上的语言研究[J].外国语,1999,22(6):9-16. 被引量:33
  • 2钱冠连.语用学的哲学渊源[J].外语与外语教学,1999(6):4-7. 被引量:43
  • 3钱冠连.不当交际工具使用的语言——西方语言哲学研究(之二)[J].外语与外语教学,2001(2):2-6. 被引量:40
  • 4徐友渔.语言与哲学[M].上海:三联书店,1996..
  • 5维特根斯坦.逻辑哲学论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1992..
  • 6Carnap. R. Logische Syntax der Sprache [ M]. Wien,1934.
  • 7Carnap. R. Meaning and Necessity [M]. Univ. of Chicago Press, 1947.
  • 8Donald, D. Truth and Interpretation [ M ]. Oxford Univ. Press, 1984.
  • 9Dummitt, M. What is a theory of meaning? (part 1)[A]. In S. Guttenplan (ed.) Mind and Language [C].Oxford Univ. Press, 1975: 97-138.
  • 10Dummitt, M. What is a theory of meaning? (part 2)[A]. In G. Evans & J. McDowell (eds.) Truth and Meaning [C]. Oxford Univ. Press, i976. 67-137.

共引文献161

同被引文献19

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部