从革命党的哲学到执政党的哲学——兼论“合二而一”与“一分为二”的哲学争论

Philosophy: From Revolutionary Political Party's to the Ruling Party's——On the Philosophical Debate between "Two Combined into One" and "One Divides into Two"

斗争哲学不是只讲斗争,不讲统一;和谐哲学也不是只讲统一,不讲斗争。关键的区别在于,斗争哲学强调斗争是要达到旧统一体的破裂,实现事物的转化;而和谐哲学虽然也讲斗争,但斗争是为了保持统一体的存在和发展。从这个意义上讲,斗争哲学是强调质变的哲学,是革命党的哲学;而和谐哲学是适应量变的哲学,是执政党的哲学,它强调质的稳定性。1964年爆发的“一分为二”与“合二而一”的论战,是斗争哲学与和谐哲学的对立,是革命党向执政党转变在哲学上的反映。

Struggling philosophy isn＇t just as far as struggle, and unity isn＇t concerned; harmonious philosophy isn＇t also just as far as unity, and struggle isn＇ t concerned. Key difference lies in： struggling philosophy stresses that struggle attempts to reach the break of past unity, realizing the transformation of things; although harmonious philosophy is also as far as struggle, struggle is to maintain the existence and development of unity. So struggling philosophy emphasizes the qualitative change of philosophy, which is the philosophy of revolutionary political party; and harmonious philosophy is the philosophy fitting in with quantitative change, which is the philosophy of the ruling party. It lays stress on the stability of quality. The debate, which broke out in 1964 between “two combined into one” and “one divides into two”, is the opposition between struggling philosophy and harmonious philosophy, and is the reflection of revolutionary political party＇s transition to the ruling party in the aspect of philosophy.