期刊文献+

主动脉内球囊反搏在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克中的应用 被引量:5

Effect of Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump with Acute Myocardial Infarction Companied by Cardiogenic Shock
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)在介入治疗急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者中的作用。方法回顾性分析19例急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者IABP辅助治疗的临床效果。结果19例患者IABP使用时间平均为93.6 h,其中13例成功地进行介入治疗(13/14,92.9%),2例成功接受外科搭桥,2例在等待搭桥术过程中死亡,1例药物治疗。三支血管病变10例(占52.6%),二支病变(前降支+回旋支)1例(占5.3%),单纯前降支5例(占26.3%),单纯左主干2例(占10.5%)。住院期间总死亡4例(4/19,21.1%),介入治疗病人死亡2例(2/14,14.3%),未介入或搭桥治疗死亡2例(2/3,66.7%)。结论IABP支持下急诊行冠脉介入治疗,可显著提高急性心肌梗死伴心源性休克患者的生存率,未能介入治疗和左主干病变经介入治疗后血液动力学仍不稳定者应及时采取外科搭桥治疗。 Objective To assess the clinical effect of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction(AMI). Methods A retrospective study was carried out in 19 AMI patients with cardiogenic shock treated with IABP and acute percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Results All patients were treated with IABP support with a mean of 93.6 h. The PCI success rate was 92.9% (13/14) and the mortality rate of PCI patients was 14.3% (2/14). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 21.1% (4/19). The mortality of non-revascularization patients was 66.7% (2/3). Conclusion IABP and acute PCI can improve haemodynamic stability and decrease cardiogenic shock inpatient mortality significantly. The prognosis is bad in patients with left main arterial or multivascular disease without revascularization therapy.
出处 《上海第二医科大学学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2005年第10期1057-1059,1069,共4页 Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Secondae Shanghai
关键词 急性心肌梗死 心源性休克 主动脉内球囊反搏 介入治疗 经皮冠状动脉腔内成形术 acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock intra-aortic balloon pump interventional therapy percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Antman EM, Braunwald E. In:Braunwald E,ed. Heart disease-a textbook of cardiovascular medicine[M]. 5th.Harcourt Asia:WB Saunders Company,1997.1238-1240.
  • 2Lindholm MG, Aldershvile J, Sundgreen C, et al. Effect of early revascularisation in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. A single center experience[J]. Eur J Heart Fail,2003,5(1):73-79.
  • 3Moreno R,Garcia E,Soriano J, et al. Early coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: predictors of poor outcome in a non-selected population[J]. J Invasive Cardiol,2001,13(3):202-210.
  • 4Webb JG, Lowe AM, Sanborn TA, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock in the SHOCK trial[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2003,42(8):1380.
  • 5Webb JG, Sanborn TA, Sleeper LA, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock in the SHOCK Trial Registry[J]. American Heart Journal,2001,141(6):964-970.
  • 6Sanborn TA, Sleeper LA, Bates ER, et al. Impact of thrombolysis, intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation, and their combination in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a report from the shock trial registry. Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiogenic shock[J]? J Am Coll Cardiol,2000,36(3 suppl A):1123-1129.
  • 7Queiros MC, Pinto PF, Silva JC, et al. Determinants of in-hospital mortality in women with acute myocardial infarction who underwent primary coronary angioplasty[J]. Rev Port Cardiol, 2000, 19(11): 1157-1161.
  • 8Antoniucci D, Valenti R, Moschi G, et al. Sex-based differences in clinical and angiographic outcomes after primary angioplasty or sten-ting for acute myocardial infarction[J].Am J Cardiol,2001,87(3):289-293.
  • 9Venkateswaran RV, Charman SC, Goddard M, et al. Lethal mesenteric ischaemia after cardiopulmonary bypass: a common complication[J]? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2002,22(4):534-538.
  • 10Meco M, Gramegna G, Yassini A, et al. Mortality and morbidity from intra-aortic balloon pumps risk analysis[J]. J Cardiovasc Surg, 2002,43(1):17-23.

同被引文献43

  • 1潘静薇,郑兴,丁继军,秦永文,马丽萍,赵仙先,徐荣良,吴宏,陈少萍.不同时间急诊冠状动脉介入治疗心肌梗死患者转归的影响[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2006,8(8):568-568. 被引量:5
  • 2和亚萍,魏盟.心肌梗死后晚期再灌注治疗的研究现状[J].中华心血管病杂志,2006,34(12):1146-1149. 被引量:19
  • 3黄从新,夏豪.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克的处理原则与经验[J].中国实用内科杂志,2007,27(2):95-98. 被引量:16
  • 4钱菊英,吴鸿谊,张峰,葛雷,樊冰,王齐兵,刘学波,葛均波.高龄急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的临床观察[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2007,9(6):379-381. 被引量:11
  • 5Babaev A,Freder PD,Pasta DJ,et al.Trends in management and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock[J].JAMA,2005,294(4):448-454.
  • 6Ryan JW,Peterson ED,Chen AY,et al.Optimal timing of intervention in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes:insights from the CRUSADE(Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress Adverse outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA guidelines)Registry[J].Circulation,2005,112(20):3049-3057.
  • 7Badaoui G,Sarkis A,Azar R,et al.Coronary angioplasty for primary cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction[J].J Med Liban,2005,53(4):195-201.
  • 8Migliorini A,Moschi C,Valenti R,et al.Routine percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute mancardial infarction[J].Am Heart J,2006,152(5):903-908.
  • 9White HD,Assmann SF,Sanbom TA,et al.Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary atery bypass prafting after acute maocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock:results from the should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock(SHOCK)trial[J].Circulation,2005,112(13):1992-2001.
  • 10马长生.心脏介入病学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1998:180-182

引证文献5

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部