1Geck M J, Eismont FJ. Surgical operations for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Orthop Clin N Am, 2002,33: 329-348.
2Hiroyuki T,Hirotsugu M, Minoru D, et al. Impaired joint proprioception in patients with cervical myelopathy. Spine, 2005,30: 83-86.
3Shinsuke S,Masataka S,Shigeru H,et al.A myelopathy due to invaginated laminae of the axis into the spinal canal. Spine,2004,29:82-84.
4Soichi K, Katsuhiro O, Kenichi W, et al. Hypertrophy of the posterior longitudinal ligament is a prodromal condition to ossificartion:A cervical myelopathy case report. Spine,2001,26:110-114.
5Kyoji O, Kozo S, Eiji A. Hypertrophic dens resulting in cervical myelopathy:Histologic features of the hypertrophic dens. Spine, 2000,25:41-45.
6Rushton SA,Albert TJ. Cervical degenerative disease:Rationale for selecting the appropriate fusion technique (anterior, posterior, and 360degree). Orthop Clin N Am, 1998,29: 755-778.
7Kabak S, Tezer M, Talu U, et al. Results of surgical treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy:Anterior cervical corpectomy and stabilization. Spine, 2004,29: 2493-2500.
8Toshikazu T,Takahiro U,Kenji I,et al. Relative safety of anterior microsurgical decompression versus laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy with a massive ossified posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine, 2002,27: 2491-2498.
9Zdenek K, Miroslav M,Josef B, et al. Approaches/to spondylotic cervical myelopathy: Conservative versus surgical results in a 3-year followup study. Spine, 2002,27: 2205-2210.
10Charles E, John H, Hideki M. Corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: An independent matched-cohort analysis. Spine, 2002,27:1168-1175.
