期刊文献+

采矿权应归属自物权而不属准物权——与《准物权研究》的作者商榷 被引量:7

Mining Right is Autonomous Article Right not Near Article Right--To Discuss with the Author of "A Research on Near Article Right"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采矿权属准物权,从理论上使国家矿产所有权失踪了,实践中是国有资产流失的暗道。采矿权归属准物权的根本原因是客体的模糊性:其客体被矿业权淹灭了、被抽象的矿产资源虚化了、被特许的公权力压迫着。《准物权研究》在这一方面出现了认识上的障碍。实质上采矿权的客体是从地壳中分离前的矿产,清晰地裸露着,因此,应当大胆承认采矿权是自物权。 Mining right is a near article right. In theory it makes the state possessory title to mineral disappear while in practice it is a dark way to lose the state capital. The reason of being near article right is the unclear object. The object of mining right is covered by the title to mineral, abstract mineral and special public right. In fact the object is mineral separated from the earth. Therefore, it should be an autonomous article right.
作者 康继田
机构地区 娄底市委党校
出处 《贵州警官职业学院学报》 2005年第6期50-52,共3页 Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College
关键词 采矿权 采矿权客体 矿产资源资产化 mining right the object of mining right make mineral resource property
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

共引文献8

同被引文献64

引证文献7

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部