摘要
鲁迅与夏目漱石在文学意义上关系隐微,但又不可小觑,他们思想上、文学上的异同取决于客观(社会历史文化背景)和主观(知识分子的禀性)两方面因素。从客观上看,“自下而上”的五四运动的不彻底性和“自上而下”的明治维新的轻率性分别构成了“当事人”身份鲁迅和“后来者”身份的夏目漱石的文化背景。从主观上看,人文批判型知识分子的禀性使得他们都经历了心理的挫败,不同的是,鲁迅仍以飞蛾扑火的精神投入到新一轮的搏击中,而夏目漱石则步入心灵的禅院,以期在静思默想之中获得心灵的宁静。
Although the relation of Luxun and Natsume Soseki on literature is not obvious, we can' t ignore it, The homology and the difference between them depend on two elements which include the social culture background and the nature disposition of intellectual. The incompleteness of Wusi New Culture Movement and the rashness of Mingzhi Reformation construct the psychology background of Luxun and Natsume Soseki separately. As the critical intellectual, they both fall into great frustration, Facing the frustration, Luxun and Natsume Soseki are different. Luxun still insists struggle, whereas Natsume Soseki chooses escape.
出处
《南都学坛(南阳师范学院人文社会科学学报)》
2005年第6期51-56,共6页
Academic Forum of Nandu:Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Nanyang Normal University