期刊文献+

西安香港大学生15FQ^+英文版人格问卷测量比较 被引量:2

Comparison of personality traits of undergraduates from Xi’an and Hongkong on the 15FQ^+
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨西安香港两地大学生人格特征的差异性。方法采用英国Psytech国际有限公司修订的15FQ+英文版人格测量问卷,对204名香港大学生和178名西安大学生进行测量,然后将二者结果进行比较。结果不同英语水平(CET4、CET6)的西安大学生,在15FQ+的16项因子中除fB和fI外,差异均无显著性(P<0.05),CET4组fB和fI分值分别是[(13.82±4.34)分]和[(13.82±4.12)分],CETB组fB和fI分值分别是[(15.24±4.80)分]和[(15.27±4.42)分];因子fB和fI分值可能与西安大学生的英语学习能力存在一定相关性;西安与香港的大学生在15FQ+的6项因子(fB、fI、fL、fO、fQ2、fQ4)上存在显著差异(P<0.01):西安大学生6项因子分值分别是:fB[(14.58±4.64)分]、fI[(14.60±4.34)分]、fL[(10.85±3.64)分]、fO[(14.28±4.64)分]、fQ2[(11.58±3.91)分]、fQ4[(17.86±4.11)分],香港大学生6项因子分值分别是:fB[(12.67±5.75)分]、fI[(16.41±4.41)分]、fL[(9.26±4.70)分]、fO[(17.64±4.29)分]、fQ2[(9.67±5.18)分]、fQ4[(11.53±6.82)分],显示出西安大学生比香港大学生具有更强的独立性和较高的焦虑程度,香港大学生(高fI、fO分值)在文化艺术方面有较高的兴趣和追求等,这些差异与以往中西方人格差异研究结果显示出较大的不同。结论15FQ+英文版具有较强的通用性,可以在中国进一步推广使用。 Objective To assess the personality traits differences between undergraduates from Xi'an and Hongkong with 15FQ^+. Methods Recruiting the undergraduates in Hongkong(N = 204,administrated by Psyteeh international limited) and Xi'an (N = 178 ) to complete the 15FQ^+ questionnaire, and then comparing the two groups' scores on the personality traits. Results Excepting factor fB and fI, there is no significant difference ( P〈0. 05) on the other 14 factors of 15FQ^+ between CET 4 and CET6 group of Undergraduate from Xi' an. The score of factor fB and fI seems to correlate in certain extent with the ability of learning English of undergraduates from Xi' an. And there is significant difference( P〈 0. 01 ) on the 6 factors among the 16 factors of the 15FQ^+between the graduates from Xi'an and Hongkong, which shows that undergraduates from Xi'an are prone to more independence and anxiety than that from Hongkong and undergraduates from Hongkong have more interesting in cultural and artisties activities and pursuits than that from Xi' an. Conclusion The 15FQ^+ is a universal questionnaire with preferable validity for the personality traits. Itean be extensively used in China.
出处 《中国行为医学科学》 CSCD 2005年第11期1026-1027,1030,共3页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science
关键词 西安市 香港 大学生 15FQ^+ 英文版 人格问卷测量 心理测量 15FQ^+ Undergraduate Personality trait Psychometrics
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献7

共引文献35

同被引文献13

  • 1高宏杰,苗丹民,李云波,王浩.中、英大学生15FQ^+英文版人格问卷测量比较[J].第四军医大学学报,2005,26(6):554-556. 被引量:5
  • 2罗正学,朱霞,陈静,苏景宽,苗丹民.任务绩效、关系绩效与工作绩效的关系研究[J].中国行为医学科学,2006,15(5):451-452. 被引量:14
  • 3Grabam Tyler.A review of the 15FQ ^+ personality questionnaire.Selection &Development Review,2003,19:7-11.
  • 4Zheng QS, Gui CQ, Sun RY. A method of comprehensive evaluation of multiple response variables in drug interaction. Indian J Pharmacol,2001,33:445-451.
  • 5Brouwer, Roelof K. Fuzzy set covering of a set of ordinal attributes without parameter sharing. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2006,157 : 1775-1786.
  • 6Lakoff G. Hedges. A study in meaning crileria and the legit of fuzzy conepts. J Philosohical Logic,1973,2:458-508.
  • 7Ma J, Fan ZP, Jiang YP, et al. A method for repairing the inconsistency of fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2006,157:20-33.
  • 8Steven JO,Miao DM,Sheng YY,et al. Adapting item format for cultural effect in translated tests : cultural effects on construct validity of the Chinese versions of MBTI. International Journal of testing, 2004,4 : 61-73.
  • 9马谋超.心理物理阈限的模糊理论[J].心理学报,1990,22:240-246.
  • 10马谋超 汪培庄.心理模糊性及其模糊统计评注-心理学的方法学探讨[J].心理学报,1985,17:177-177.

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部