期刊文献+

水洞沟:东西方文化交流的风向标?——兼论华北小石器文化和“石器之路”的假说 被引量:13

SHUIDONGGOU:A VANE OF INTERCOMMUNICATION BETWEEN THE EAST AND THE WEST?——DISCUSSION ABOUT SMALL TOOL CULTURE IN NORTH CHINA AND A HYPOTHESIS OF THE “LITHIC ROAD”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 水洞沟文化从发现之初便以其所具有的西方旧石器中、晚期特点而引起了学者们的注意,并被后来的很多学者引证为东西方交流的有利证据。但是对于在这一文化现象里所发生的交流模式的探讨依然含糊,或者它不言而喻是一种“西来”的模式。随着对该文化中存在的“勒瓦娄哇石核”技术的揭示,这一观点似乎只会被加强。然而新的研究证据使人们有可能质疑过去的观点,而重新审视水洞沟文化的内涵和意义。文章通过水洞沟文化中“东谷坨石核”的再现,对水洞沟文化在东西方文化交流中的位置提出新的看法,进而探讨华北小石器文化的主导性与传播性,并指出确立旧石器时代早期“华北中心说”和“华北小石器文化自源性”概念的必要性,提出历史时期东西方文化交流中“丝绸之路”的前身应为史前时期即已存在的“石器之路”的假说,认为水洞沟是东西方文化交流与传播的风向标。 Since the first discovery of Shuidonggou (SDG) culture, its western characters of Middle Paleolithic and Upper Paleolithic has attracted much attention and adduced as favorable evidence of communication between the East and the West. However, it is still vague about how the communication occurred in this cultural phenomenon, or it is just telling one story of “complete influence from the West”. By recognizing the existence of Levallois technique in SDG culture this opinion can only be reinforced. Whereas, new evidence make it possible to be doubted and survey anew the content and significance of the culture. Based on many fine researching work made by scholars home and abroad, a pertinent study has been carr/ed out and many common phenomena of typical Paleolithic sites in North China and circumjacent region have been revealed. Among them, the “Donggutuo (DGT) core” identified by the present author from SDG and some other sites is taken as a key clue and full characteristic of Eastern cultural style rooted in the East far time ago. Corresponding to Levallois core in the West, the DGT core is an Eastern example as a cultural mark in prehistoric time. Nay, it had been exported and transported into a big surrounding area in North China and Northeastern Asia. The “DGT core” and relevant cultural assemblages provide a lineal development of Paleolithic culture in North China. It represents the most primitive shape of narrow-shaped core which has been researched as a rooted type of microlithic wedge-shaped core in the vast territory of Northeast Asia, especially in East Asia. The “DGT core” can be taken as the earliest and the most important evidence of the origin of microblade cultural tradition and supports the Northern China Origin of microblade tradition. This issue not only concerns the problem of origin of early human but also modern human. The evidence is consistent with the theory of “Continuity and Hybridization”. Therefore, the author brings forward a new perspective on situation of SDG culture in communication between the East and the West through the reappearance of “DGT core”, and discusses the dominant and diffusive role played by the small tool industry of North China. Further, the author points out the necessity of establishing concepts of “North China center” and “local-originated, dominance and diffusion of small tool culture in North China”. A hypothesis of “Pre-Silk Road” namely “Lithic Road” is also proposed by the author in the article. Like many Middle and Upper Paleolithic sites in Middle and North Asia, SDG culture is supposed as one example of a vane of indicating the Eastern and the Western intercommunication and diffusion along the road during that time. Meanwhile, some relevant evidence of anthropology has also been well discussed. Finally the driving force of cultural development and continuity compelled by environmental change is very much emphasized in the article as well as evidence presented from both archaeology and anthropology, and are putting in good prospect.
作者 侯亚梅
出处 《第四纪研究》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第6期750-761,共12页 Quaternary Sciences
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(批准号:40172009) 国家科学技术部中国-斯洛文尼亚(2001-2002 2003-2004)合作项目 中国科学院优秀博士学位论文奖获得者启动专项资金项目资助
关键词 水洞沟文化 东西方交流 “东谷坨石核” 华北小石器文化的自源性 主导性与传播性“石器之路” Shuidonggou culture, communication between the East and the West, “Donggutuo core”,local-originated, dominance and diffusion of small tool culture in North China, “Lithic Road”
  • 相关文献

参考文献42

  • 1Boule M, Breuil H, Licent E et al. Le Paléolithique de la Chine. Archives de l'Institute de Paléontologie Humaine, 1928, Memoire 4:1 ~ 138.
  • 2宁夏文物考古研究所 水洞沟.1980年发掘报告[M].北京:科学出版社,2003.1-233.
  • 3李炎贤.中国旧石器时代晚期文化的划分[J].人类学学报,1993,12(3):214-223. 被引量:45
  • 4黄慰文.中国旧石器文化序列的地层学基础[J].人类学学报,2000,19(4):269-283.
  • 5Lovlie R, Su Pu, Fan Xingzhao et al. Revised paleomagnetic age of the Nihewan group at Xujiayao Paleolithic site. In: Dong Wei ed.Proceedings of 1999 Beijing International Symposium on Paleoanthropology. Acta Anthropologica Sinica ,2000,19 ( Suppl. ) :270 ~ 278.
  • 6李炎贤 谢飞 石金鸣.河北阳原板井子石制品的初步研究[A].见:中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所编.第十三届国际第四纪大会中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所论文选[C].北京:北京科学技术出版社,1991.74-95.
  • 7贾兰坡,卫奇.阳高许家窑旧石器时代文化遗址[J].考古学报,1976(2):97-114. 被引量:106
  • 8曹泽田.贵州水城硝灰洞旧石器文化遗址.古脊椎动物与古人类,1978,16(1):67-72.
  • 9曹泽田.《猫猫洞旧石器之研究》[J].古脊椎动物与古人类,1982,.
  • 10李炎贤,蔡回阳.贵州白岩脚洞石器的第二步加工[J].江汉考古,1986(2):56-64. 被引量:23

共引文献543

同被引文献277

引证文献13

二级引证文献95

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部