从实体正义到程序正义:卢梭与罗尔斯契约正义观之比较

From substantive justice to procedural justice:comparing Rousseau's justice with Rolls'

卢梭的契约正义观与罗尔斯的契约正义观在形式上有其相似之处。但由于他们各自所处的时代背景不同,其正义观的价值内核、论证方式及其实现途径都存在着重大的差别。从卢梭的契约正义观到罗尔斯的契约正义观的嬗变代表了西方正义论从实体正义向程序正义的转变,把握这一转变的趋向及其内在精神实质,对于丰富和完善当代中国和谐社会建设的理论和实践是大有裨益的。

There are some sameness between Rousseau＇s contract justice and Rolls＇contract justice in the form. But there epochbackground exit difference, so there value ＇s kernel, argumentation ＇s way and realizing ＇s approach of value have great difference. The change which is from Rousseau＇s contract- justice to Rolls＇contract- justice represents the change from substantive justice to procedural justice. It is advantaged to hold the tendency and its spirit essential, which can profit for being affluent in the theory that our country develops the harmonious society.