期刊文献+

披碱草和野大麦及其杂种苗期抗旱性研究 被引量:14

Studies on Drought Resistance of Elymus dahuricus,Hordeum brevisubulatum and Their Hybrid F_1 at Seedling Stage.
原文传递
导出
摘要 在室内人工模拟干旱条件,测定了干旱胁迫下披碱草和野大麦及其杂种幼苗的相对含水量、细胞膜透性、游离脯氨酸含量的变化。结果表明,干旱胁迫下亲本披碱草幼苗的组织相对含水量下降的幅度最低,细胞膜受害最轻,游离脯氨酸积累的最多,相对生长率最高,表现出很强的抗旱性。亲本野大麦幼苗的组织相对含水量下降的幅度最大,细胞膜受害最重,游离脯氨酸积累的最少,相对生长率最低,抗旱性弱。杂种F1幼苗的保水能力、细胞膜受害程度和游离脯氨酸积累能力、相对生长率均介于双亲之间,亦即其抗旱能力大于野大麦而小于披碱草,表现为双亲的中间型。正、反交对杂种F1的抗旱能力没有明显影响。 The relative water content, ceil membrane permeability and free proline content of Elymus duhuricus, Hordeum brevisubulatum and their hybrid at seedling stage were determined under simulated drought conditions in room. The results showed that the relative water content of seedlings of Elymus dahuricus was declined a little, the cell membrane was damaged slightly, free proline was accumulated the most,the relative growth rate was the hightest, which showed that the drought resistance of Elymus dahuricus was the strongest. The water content of Hordeurn brevisubulatum was decreased the most, the cell membrane was damage the most seriously, free proline was accumulated the least, relative growth rate was the lowest, which showed that the drought resistance of Hordeum brevisubulatum was the wea kest. The water conservation, damage degree of cell membrane, ability of free proline accumulation and relative growth rate of F1 seedlings were between Elymus dahuricus and Hordeum brevisubulatum, which meant that the drought resistance of F1 seedlings was in the middle of parents. There were no significant differences in drought resistance between Elymus dahuricus × Hordeum brevisubulatum and Hordeum brevisubulatum × Elumus dahuricus.
出处 《中国草地》 CSCD 2005年第6期23-27,共5页 Grassland of China
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(30260074)
关键词 披碱草 野大麦 杂种 苗期 抗旱性 Drought resistance Elymus dahuricus Hordeum brevisubulatum Hybrid Seedling stage
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献14

  • 1袁文业,孙善澄,张美荣,裴自友,孙玉.小麦-偃麦草-簇毛麦三属杂交后代形态学、细胞学和育性的研究[J].作物学报,1994,20(4):504-507. 被引量:10
  • 2王洪刚,孔令让,姜丽君,张德水.八倍体小偃麦与普通小麦杂种自交和回交后代染色体和性状分离的研究[J].作物学报,1996,22(4):508-512. 被引量:7
  • 3汤章城.植物对水分胁迫的反应和适应性一Ⅱ:植物对干旱的反应和适应性[J].植物生理学通讯,1983,98(4):1-7.
  • 4李云荫 尚忠林 吴丁 卢翠乔.作物抗旱生理与21世纪农业[A].吴丁,卢翠乔.植物生理学与跨世纪农业研究[c].第1版[C].北京:科学出版社,1999.19-27.
  • 5Bouslama M, Schapaugh W T. Stress tolerence in soybeans--I. Evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance [J]. Crop Science, 1984,24 : 932 - 937.
  • 6Kaufmann M R, Eekard A N. Water potential and temperature optimum in relation of engelmann spruce and lodgpole pine seeds[J]. Forest Science, 1997, 23:27 -33.
  • 7Brom W V and G A Partt. Hybridization and introgression in the grass genus Elymus [J]. Amer. J.Bot.,1960,47:669-676.
  • 8Dewey D R. Wide hybridization and induced polyploid breeding strategies for perennial grass of the Triticeae tribe[J]. Iowa Jour. Res.,1984,58:383-399.
  • 9Dewey D R. Synthetic hybrids of Hordeum bodanii with Elymus canadensis and Sitanion hystrix[J]. Amer. Jour. Bot.,1971,58:902-908.
  • 10Stebbinds G L and Singh. Artificial and natural hybrid in the Gramineae,tribe Hordeae IV. Two triploid hybrids of Agropyron and Elymus [J]. Amer. J. Bot.,1950,37:338-392.

共引文献85

同被引文献166

引证文献14

二级引证文献82

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部