票据诈骗罪犯罪客体新论——从公私法区分的角度

Again on the Criminal Object of Crime of Negotiable Instrument Fraud—— From the Viewpoint of Discriminating the Public Law and Private Law

已有观点对于票据诈骗罪犯罪客体的认识,囿于“纯刑法”或者“纯公法”的思维方式,认为其主要客体是票据管理秩序。然而,对于此问题应从整个法律体系(刑法与其他部门法或者公法与私法的关系)的角度,并结合刑法分则的体系结构进行整体把握。本罪的主要客体应该是“票据流通秩序”,而不是所谓的“票据管理秩序”,二者分别代表了“公”和“私”两种不同的法益。

In respect to the main criminal object of crime of negotiable instrument fraud, the prevalent theory, from viewpoints of mere criminal law or public law, it suggests that the main object is the administrative order of bills. However, we should grasp it in the whole legal system combined with the systematic structure of criminal law. The main object of crime of negotiable instrument fraud should be ＂the circulation order of bills＂ instead of ＂the administrative order of bills＂, and the difference between these two is that the former represents the interests of the public while and the later stands for private legal interests.