摘要
目的运用射频与高频介入技术对消化道息肉治疗的比较。方法内镜下运用射频技术和高频技术治疗消化道息肉。结果射频组106例治疗全部成功,其中2例较大息肉(2.0-3.0cm)进行二次治疗;高频组73例中71例治疗有效,1例广基无蒂较大息肉(2.7cm)因切割困难后改作射频治疗,1例固有蒂小息肉(0.3cm)圈套器收紧较紧造成机械性切割脱落发生出血。结论射频、高频技术在治疗消化道息肉中都是行之有效的介入治疗手段,射频治疗消化道息肉更加安全可靠,易于推广。
Objective The comparison study of applying radiofreauency and highfreauency intervene technics tor treating alimentary canal polyp. Methods Apply radiofrequency and higlffrequency under endoscopy for treating alimentary canal polyp. Results The treatments were entirely successful in 106 cases radiofrequency group. Insides, 2 bigger polyps case(2.0-3.0 centimeter) were retreated. 71 cases were effective in 73 cases biglffrequency group, radiofrequenly treatment was instead of highfrequency treatment in one widly radicle and pedicle case(2.7centimeter), because of incising difficutly. One pedicle and little polyp case(0. 3centimeter) happen to bleed, for that snare fraply resulted in mechanical incise shedding. Conclusion Radiofrequency and highfrequency technics are effective intervene means in treatment of alimentary canal polyp. Radiofreauency treatment is unconglutinate and safe, so that it is easy to be popularized.
出处
《中华当代医学》
2005年第11期4-6,共3页
Chinese Modern Medicine
关键词
射频
高频
内镜
消化道息肉
Rafiofreauency
Highfreauency
Endoscopy
Alimentary Canal polyp