期刊文献+

从认知角度看隐喻和转喻的功能差异 被引量:10

A Contrastive Study of the Functions of Metonymy and Metaphor: From the Cognitive Perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 隐喻和转喻不仅是两种修辞格,而且是人类重要的两种思维方式;同时也是人类认识客观世界的认知方式。两者在修辞、认知、语义及社会功能上都有着区别。隐喻是以事物间的相似联想为心理基础,从一个领域投射到另一个领域的认知方式,其主要功能是对事物的描述;转喻是以事物间的邻近联想为基础,在同一认知域内用突显、易感知、易记忆、易辨认的部分代替整体或整体的其他部分,或用具有完形感知的整体代替部分,其主要功能是对事物的指称。 Metaphor and metonymy are not only figures of speech but also common modes of thinking. These two important phenomena share some fundamental differences as well as similarities in terms of their rhetoric, cognitive, semantic and social functions. Metaphor involves things from two different domains and its creation is based on association by similarity. As metonymy uses a special property of something or the thing's special relationship with other things to denote the thing, its major function is to help a hearer recognize the referent and its special characteristics.
作者 曾庆敏
出处 《西南政法大学学报》 2005年第5期131-134,共4页 Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词 隐喻 转喻 认知功能 理想化认知模式 metaphor metonymy cognitive function ICMs
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1[2]Aristotle. Rhetoric and Poetics [ M ]. New York: The Modern Library. 1954.25.
  • 2[3][7]Ullmann, S. Semantics: An Introduction to the Science of Meaning [ M ]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 1962. 215.223.
  • 3[5]Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. Metaphors We Live by[ M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1980.4.
  • 4董成如.转喻的认知解释[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2004,27(2):6-9. 被引量:124
  • 5[8]Lakoff, G. & Turner, M. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor[ M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1989. 103.

二级参考文献12

  • 1[1]Barcelona,A. On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor[A].Barcelona.Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads[C].Berlin/ New York: Moulton de Gruyter,2000.
  • 2[2]Hopper,P.& Traugott, E. Grammaticalization[M].Cambridge:CUP,1993.
  • 3[3]Kovecses,Z.Metaphor:A Practical Introduction[M].Oxford:OUP,2002.
  • 4[4]Lakoff,G.Woman,Fire and Dangerous Things[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1987.
  • 5[5]Lakoff,G.and M.Johnson.Metaphors We Live By[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1980.
  • 6[6]Langacker,R.Grammar and Conceptualization[M].Berlin/New York:Moulton de Gruyter,1999.
  • 7[7]Langacker,R.Topic,subject and possessor[A].Simonsen & Endresen.A Cognitive Approach to the Verb:Morphorlogical and Constructional Perspectives[C].Berlin/New York:Moulton de Gruyter,2001.
  • 8[8]Langacker,R.Concept, Image and Symbol:the Cognitive Basis of Grammar(2nd Edition)[M]. Berlin/New York:Moulton de Gruyter,2002.
  • 9[9]Levinson,S.C.Presumptive Meanings:the Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicatures[M].Cambridge,Massachusetts/London:the MIT Press,2000.
  • 10[10]Panther,K & Thornburg, L. The potentiality for actuality metonymy in English and Hungarian [A].Panther & Radden.Metonymy in Language and Thought[C].Amsterdam:John Benjamins,1999.

共引文献123

同被引文献59

引证文献10

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部