期刊文献+

乳腺影像报告与数据系统对临床触诊阴性乳腺病灶分类的价值 被引量:14

Nonpalpable breast lesions categorization by breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS)
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨乳腺影像报告与数据系统(breast imaging reporting and data system,BI-RADS)对于临床触诊阴性乳腺病灶分类的意义及指导乳腺病灶活检的价值。方法由X线摄影发现的触诊阴性乳腺病灶162个,按照美国放射学会制定的第四版BI-RADS对其分类,所有病灶均采用金属线定位活检技术获得组织学诊断。结果全组162个触诊阴性病灶中,确认乳腺癌46个,阳性预测值为28.4%。按照BI-RADS分类,2类病灶11例,其中癌0例;3类病灶55例,癌2例;4类病灶77例,癌29例;5类病灶19例,癌15例;BI-RADS2-5类病灶癌的阳性预测值分别为0%,3.6%,37.7%与78.9%。结论BI-RADS分类大大提高了触诊阴性乳腺病灶影像诊断的特异性,可用于指导活检指征的选择,建议对BI-RADS4类与5类病灶进行活检,以提高触诊阴性乳腺病灶活检的阳性率。 Objective To evaluate breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) in categorization and biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions (NPBLs), Methods One hundred and sixty-two NPBLs from 144 female patients detected by mammography were retrospectively categorized according to BI- RADS. All the lesions finally got histopathological diagnosis by wire-localization biopsy. Results There were 46 malignant lesions, with the positive predictive value for cancer of 28.4% (46/162). The cases of BI-RADS 2-5 lesions were 11, 55, 77, and 19 after categorization according to the BI-RADS, and the positive predictive value of each category for cancer was 0% (0/11 ) ,3.6% (2/55), 37.7% (29/77), 78.9% (15/19) respectively. Conclusion BI-RADS categorization improves the diagnostic specificity of nonpalpable breast lesions and helps decision-making for biopsy. It is suggested that NPBLs on category of BI-RADS 4 or 5 should undergo biopsy.
出处 《中华普通外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2005年第11期707-709,共3页 Chinese Journal of General Surgery
基金 国家"十五"科技攻关项目(2001BA703B20)
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 乳房X线摄影术 触诊 活组织检查 Breast neoplasms Mammography : Palpation : Biopsy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system. 4th ed. Reston, VA : American College of Radiology. 2003.
  • 2Al-Sobhi SS, Helvie MA, Pass HA, et al. Extent of lumpectomy for breast cancer after diagnosis by stereotactic core versus wire localization biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol, 1999, 6: 330-335.
  • 3Varas X, Leborgne JH, Leborgne F, et al. Revisiting the mammographic follow-up of BI-RADS category 3 lesions. A JR,2002.179:691-695.
  • 4Vizcaino l, Gadea L, Andreo L, et al. Short-term follow-up results in 795 nonpalpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography. Radiology, 2001,219:475-483.
  • 5Ball CG, Butchart M, MacFarlane JK. Effect on biopsy technique of the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) for nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities. Can J Surg, 2002,45 :259 -263.
  • 6Tan YY, Wee SB, Tan MP, et al. Positive predictive value of BIRADS categorization in an Asian population. Asian J Surg, 2004,27 : 186-191.

同被引文献85

引证文献14

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部