期刊文献+

4种牙体修复材料对人牙髓细胞毒性的实验研究 被引量:5

Cytotoxicity of 4 kinds of dental restorative materials on human pulp cell in vitro
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较4种牙体修复材料———DyractAP、Ceram X、Qu ixfilU及Surefil复合树脂对人牙髓细胞的生物学作用。方法:制备4种牙体修复材料的细胞培养基(DMEM)浸出液,采用四唑盐MTT比色分析法测定材料对人牙髓细胞生长的影响;通过扫描电镜观察人牙髓细胞在不同材料表面的生长情况。结果:人牙髓细胞在4种复合树脂浸出液作用下,细胞相对增值率(RGR)与对照组相比均有显著性差异(P<0.05),其中Surefil的RGR与其他3种材料相比有显著性差异(P<0.05),而Ceram X、Qu ixfil U、Dyract AP 3种材料之间RGR无显著性差异(P>0.05);扫描电镜观察到人牙髓细胞在4种材料表面均可贴附,且生长良好。结论:4种牙体修复材料均对牙髓细胞的生长无不良影响,具有良好的生物相容性。 AIM :To test the cytotoxic effect of 4 kinds of dental resin based restorative materials Dyract AP ,Ceram X ,Quixfil U and Surefil on human pulp cell in vitro. METHODS :4 dental restorative materials were soaked in culture medium ( DMEM ) for leachate solution. The effect of each material on viability of pulp cell was measured by the MTT assay. The adherence of pulp cell to different material sudace was observed under SEM. RESULTS : Under the effect of leachate solution of 4 composite resin materials, relative growth rate( RGR )for pulp cell showed significant difference between experimental groups and control group (P 〈0.05 ). In the experimental groups the RGR of Surefil has significant difference compared with the other 3 materials (P 〈0.05 ). There was no statistical significant difference bamong RGRs of Ceram X ,Quixfil U ad Dyract AP (P 〉0.05 ). Under SEM pulp cells showed good adherence to all 4 kinds of materials, CONCLUSION :The cytotoxic effect of 4 kinds of dental restorative materials on pulp cell was relatively low in vitro, which indicated that all the materials has good biocompatibility.
出处 《牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志》 CAS 2005年第11期613-616,共4页 Chinese Journal of Conservative Dentistry
基金 "十五"国家科技攻关计划课题资助项目(2004BA720A23)
关键词 牙髓细胞 牙科复合树脂 MTT检测 扫描电镜 pulp cell dental composite resin MTF assay Scanning Electron Microscope
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1牛忠英,史俊南,肖明振,苏凌云,陆怀秀,鬼岛成和,片山伊九右卫门.玻璃离子水门汀的体外细胞毒性研究[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志,1996,6(4):206-208. 被引量:11
  • 2Willershausen B,Schafer D.Influence of resin-based restoration materials on cytotoxicity in gingival fibroblasts[J].Eur J Med Res,1999,4(4):149.
  • 3Wataha JC,Rueggeberg FA,Lapp CA,et al.In vitro cytotoxicity of resin-containing restorative materials after aging in artificial saliva[J].Clinical Oral Investigations,1999,3(3):144.
  • 4Quinlan CA,Zisterer DM,Tipton KF,et al.In vitro cytotoxicity of a composite resin and compomer[J].International Endodontic Journal,2002,35(1):47.
  • 5Schedle A,Ivanova M, Kenndler E. Determination of ethoxylated bisphenol A dimethacrylate monomers in dental composites by micellar electrokinetic chromatography.Journal of Chromatography, 2003, 990(1-2):231.
  • 6Rathbun MA,Craig RC.Cytotoxicity of a Bis-GMA dental composite before and afer leaching in organic solvents[J].Journal of Biomedical Materials Reseach,1991,25:443.
  • 7Geurtsen W,Spahl W.Residual monomer/additive release and variablility in cytotoxicity of light-curing glass-ionomer cements and compomer[J].Journal of Dental Reseach,1998,77,2012.
  • 8Chen CC,Chen RC,Huang ST,et al.Enzymatic responses of human deciduous pulpal fibroblasts to dental restorative materials[J].Journal oBiomedical Materials Research,2002,60(3):452.
  • 9Huang FM,Chang YC.Cytotoxicity of resin-based restorative materials on human pulp cell cultures[J].Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod,2002,94(3):361.

共引文献10

同被引文献82

引证文献5

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部