摘要
以“深爱接”、“大重”及《金楼子》有“袭自《文心》”观之,昭明编纂《文选》或受到舍人的某些影响。然沈约“大重”《文心雕龙》,说明不了其在当时得到多大的关注;刘勰虽说被“深爱接”,然其远非昭明之最亲近者,“深”无以落到实处;《文选》与《文心雕龙》的诸多共同点,或在“历赏”之后,或人人均会如此,故不能不同。综合方方面面的情况看,《文选》深受《文心雕龙》影响之说,显然是不能成立的。
Quite a number of present-day scholars have argued that Wen Xuan was deeply affected by Wen Xin Diao Long with the evidence that: Jin Lou Zi mentioned the impact of the latter upon the former, Shen Yue expressed his admiration of Wen Xin Diao Long, and Liu Xie, the author of Wen Xin Diao Long, claimed the wide-rage popularity of his book. However, all this could not explain the deep impact of Wen Xin Diao Long upon Wen Xuan though the two books have many things in common. By studying the situation in an all-round way, no solid grounds could be found to prove that Wen Xuan was deeply affected by Wen Xin Diao Long.
出处
《广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2005年第4期71-76,共6页
Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
文选
文心雕龙
影响
比较
Wen Xuan
Wen Xin Diao Long
impact
comparison