期刊文献+

支架式教学:概念、手段及模式(英文) 被引量:50

APPROACHES AND MODELS INVOLVING THE CONCEPT OF INSTRUCTIONAL SCAFFOLDING
下载PDF
导出
摘要 作为一种教育策略,支架式教学概念源自于维果茨基的辅助学习概念。支架式教学的理论框架基于维果茨基的最近发展区概念,有悖于皮亚杰的强调学习过程的建构性的认知法。与支架式教学概念相近似的一个概念是克拉申的输入假设,即“i+1”可理解输入概念。搭建支架的性质是动态的,但其主要特征仍可识别。涵盖支架式教学关键性特征的教学模式有交互式、认知学徒式、自生语言精致、自主教学策略发展等教学模式。支架式教学可通过搭脚手架策略,在认知支架、情感支架、策略支架、技术支架等领域促进学习的迁移。在支架式教学过程中,教师通常提供三种支架:媒介支架、任务支架、材料支架。尽管支架式教学可最大化优化学习效果,在其有效使用上还存在着局限。因而,“自然发展”和“教学支架”教学手段应互补。 Instructional scaffolding stems from Vigotsky's view on supplementary learning. The theoretical framework of instructional scaffolding, based on Vigotsky's concept of approximate development area, is apposed to Piajet's structuralist cognition which emphasizes learning process. Close to the instructional scaffolding is the input supposition, or “1+1” comprehensible input concept. Instructional scaffolding as an instructional strategy can stimulate the learning transfer in such areas as cognition, emotion, strategy, techniques. IN the process of instructional scaffolding, teachers tend to provide 3 scaffolds - vehicle scaffold, task scaffold and material scaffold. Instructional scaffolding optimizes the results of learning, but it has its limitation in application. Therefore, “natural development” and “scaffolding method of teaching” are mutually complementary.
作者 刘迎
出处 《广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2005年第4期114-121,共8页 Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 支架式教学 最近发展区 教学模式 支架领域 支架策略 最大化优化学习 instructional scaffolding approximate development area teaching model scaffolding strategy optimized learning
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1[1]Slavin R E.Educational Psychology:Theory and Practice[M].Needham Heights:Allyn and Bacon,1994.
  • 2[2]Rosenshine B,Meister C.The Use of Scaffolds for Teaching Higher-Level Cognitive Strategies [A].Woolfolk A K.Readings & Cases in Educational Psychology (5th ed) [M].Boston:Allyn and Bacon,1993.
  • 3[3]Vygotsky L S.Mind in society:The development of higher psychological processes[M].Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,1978.
  • 4[4]Greenfield P M.A theory of the teacher in the learning activities of everyday life[A].B.Rogoff,J.Lave (Eds.),Everyday Cognition:Its Development in Social Context [C].Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,1984.117-138.
  • 5[5]Winn J A.Promises and challenges of scaffolded instruction[J].Learning Disability Quarterly,1994,17:89-104.
  • 6[6]Peregoy S F,Boyle O F.Reading,writing,&learning in ESL.A resource book for K-12 teachers[M].New York:Longman Publishers,1997.
  • 7[7]Palincsar A M,A L Brown.Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Moni-toring Activities [J].Cognition and Instruction 1994,2:117-175.
  • 8[8]Collins A,Brown J,Newman S.Cognitive apprenticeship:Teaching the crafts of reading,writing,and mathematics [A].Lauren B.Resnick.Knowing,learning,and instruction:Essays in honor of Robert Glaser[C].Hillsdale,NJ:Erlbaum Associates,1989.
  • 9[9]King A.Facilitating elaborative learning through guided student-generated questioning [J].Educational Psychologist,1992,27 (1):111-126.
  • 10[10]Graham S,Harris K R.Improving learning disabled students' skills at composing essays:Self-instructional strategy training [J].Exceptional Children,1989,56 (30):201-214.

同被引文献201

引证文献50

二级引证文献186

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部