自由·自然·名教——郭象自由思想之论证逻辑探析

Freedom·Nature·Norm: An Exploration of the Argumentation Logic of Guo Xiang's Idea of Freedom

“自然”与“名教”之辩是魏晋玄学的中心议题。郭象对庄子自由思想的有意误读和曲解,旨在论证名教即自然。郭象对自由的论证有严密的论证逻辑:曲解庄子逍遥之义是其逻辑之始,自性论是其逻辑之基,自生和独化是其逻辑之干,自然即为命定是其逻辑归约,名教即自然是其逻辑之果。

The argument of norm and nature is the central issue of Wei-Jin metaphysics. Guo Xiang intentionally misinterprets Zhuang Zi＇s idea of freedom to demonstrate that norm is nature. There is strict logic in Guo Xiang＇s argumentation of freedom. He begins his argumentation by misinterpreting Zhuang Zi＇s idea of freedom, supports his own logic with his theory of self, his ideas of self-birth and self-alteration, and summarizes his argumentation with the idea that nature is fate and that norm is nature.