摘要
针对近年来学术界否定吴承恩力主丘处机麾下全真道徒为百回本《西游记》最早作者的观点,作者从道教与《西游记》、茅山与《西游记》、虞集序真伪与《西游记》等关系正本清源,驳斥胡义成等立论暨论据的错误,指出百回本《西游记》最早作者绝不是丘处机麾下的全真道徒。
In recent years, some scholars in academic circles maintain that the earliest author of A Journey to the west should be Quanzhen Taoist priests under QIU Chu-ji instead of WU Cheng-en. To counter such viewpoint, the write here thoroughly clarifies the relations between Taoism and A Journey to the West, Mountain Mao and the latter, and Yuji's preface and the latter. The writer points out the errors of Mr. HU Yi-cheng's argument and stresses that the earliest author of A Journey to the west should, in no case, be Quanzhen Taoist priests under QIU Chu-ji stract.
出处
《唐山师范学院学报》
2005年第6期1-5,共5页
Journal of Tangshan Normal University
基金
安徽省教育厅2005年度人文社会科学研究项目(2005sk269)
关键词
丘处机
全真道士
百回本《西游记》
茅山
虞集序
QIU Chu-ji
Quanzhen Taoist priests
A Journey to the west
Mountain Mao
Yuji's Preface