期刊文献+

“楚方急围汉王于荥阳”辨析 被引量:1

The Discrimination of Chu's Siege of Han-king at Xing-yang
下载PDF
导出
摘要 韩信求封“假王”之事,一直被学术界认为“借机争权”或“居功要挟以求利”。仔细分析史料,我们发现,当时不管是从楚汉双方力量对比,还是战争发展的态势,汉王刘邦均已掌握了战争的主动权,韩信求封,并非是邀功请赏,而是从亡楚兴汉的战略目的出发,增强对齐这一战略要地的控制力量。刘邦执行军功封赏的原则,分封韩信为齐王,既顺应了时代潮流,又能够利用韩信的势力,稳定齐这一战略要地的局势,为取得楚汉战争的最后胜利奠定了坚实的基础。 Han-xin'asking for “Furlough-King” has been throught “to scrabble for the authority” or “take credit to himself in order to benefit” by the academe.Earnestly analyzing historical data, we are to dig out that Liu-Bang had masteried not only the powers of Chu and Han but also the development posture of the war. Han-xin asking for “Furlough-King” was to strengthen the military power in order to control Qi, not to take credit for his merit. Curriing out the principle of military exploit's reward, Liu-bang nominated Han-xin as Qi's king, not only to go with the tide of historical development, but also to make use of Han-xin's force to stabilize the Qi's situation, and lay solid foundation for the final victory of the Chu-Han's war.
机构地区 吉林大学古籍所
出处 《晋阳学刊》 北大核心 2005年第6期76-78,共3页 Academic Journal of Jinyang
关键词 楚汉战争 韩信 荥阳 Chu-Han's war Han-xin Xingyang
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1(西汉)司马迁.史记[M].北京:中华书局,1996..
  • 2赵玉良.对韩信被诛原因之异见[J].上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1992,21(3):94-95. 被引量:2
  • 3曹家齐.刘邦分封与西汉统一政权的建立和巩固[J].江苏师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1993,33(1):43-46. 被引量:2
  • 4(明)王夫之.读通鉴论[M].北京:中华书局,1975..
  • 5(宋)李昉.太平御览[M].北京:中华书局,1998..
  • 6(北宋)司马光.资治通鉴[M].北京:中华书局,1995..
  • 7(东汉)班固.汉书[M].北京:中华书局,1996..
  • 8(东汉)荀悦.前汉纪[M].北京:中华书局,2002..
  • 9(清)王元启.史记月表证伪[A].梁玉绳.史记汉书诸表订补十种[M].北京:中华书局,1982..
  • 10(清)梁玉绳.史记志疑[M].北京:中华书局,1981..

共引文献6

同被引文献6

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部