期刊文献+

管理层变更与控制权市场治理效力的实证研究——以制造业上市公司为例 被引量:14

Management Turnover and Market of Corporate Control——An Empirical Analysis of Chinese Listed Companies of Manufacturing
原文传递
导出
摘要 2002、2003年我国制造业上市公司各类管理层更替现象的实证分析表明,在快速增长的股权交易的推动下,我国控制权市场已经初步形成,控制权市场对管理低效企业的识别、惩戒功能已经显现。作为企业的外部控制机制,控制权市场通过控制权转移、管理层更替的途径发挥了应有的治理效力,弥补了董事会治理的不足。大力发展控制权市场要从规范股权交易、加快国家股减持和全流通进程、完善制度建设等方面进行努力。 It has been clearly shown by the empirical analyses of management turnover among Chinese listed companies of manufacturing in 2002 and 2003 that the market of corporate control has been shaped in China with the promotion of equity transaction. And, as an external governance mechanism, it has been effective in selecting low-level enterprises and punishing management with control rights transference and management turnover. The market of corporate control has reduced the deficiency of the board of directors. The development of it may be guaranteed by normalization of the transaction behaviors, dilution of the equity proportion owned by state, and reinforcement of the legal systems.
机构地区 南京大学商学院
出处 《南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第6期117-126,共10页 Journal of Nanjing University(Philosophy,Humanities and Social Sciences)
关键词 控制权市场 管理层更替 治理效力 the market of corporate control management turnover governance effects
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1剧锦文.国企上市公司治理结构中控制权配置及其优化途径[J].上市公司,2001(10):35-37. 被引量:5
  • 2韩志国.正视中国股市十大现实问题[N].上海证券报,2002—03—05.
  • 3Henry G. Manne. Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1965, (2).
  • 4R. Morck, A. Shleifer, R. W. Vishny. Alternative Mechanisms for Corporate Control [ J ]. American Economic Review, 1989, (9).
  • 5D. Hirshleifer, A. V. Thakor. Managerial Performance, Boards of Directors and Takeover Bidding [ J ]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 1994, (3).
  • 6W. H. Mikkelson,M. M. Partch. The Decline of Takeovers and Disciplinary Managerial Turnover[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1997, (5).
  • 7J. Franks, C. Mayer. Hostile Takeovers and the Correction of Managerial Failure [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1996, (1).
  • 8A. P. Diekerson. Takeover Risk and the Market for Corporate Control: the Experience of British Firms in the 1970s and 1980s [ J ]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2002, (10).
  • 9冯根福,吴林江.我国上市公司并购绩效的实证研究[J].经济研究,2001,36(1):54-61. 被引量:777
  • 10李善民,王彩萍,曾昭灶,陈玉罡,朱滔.中国上市公司资产重组长期绩效研究[J].管理世界,2004,20(9):131-136. 被引量:46

二级参考文献66

  • 1陈小悦,徐晓东.股权结构、企业绩效与投资者利益保护[J].经济研究,2001,36(11):3-11. 被引量:785
  • 2吴世农.我国证券市场效率的分析[J].经济研究,1996,31(4):13-19. 被引量:317
  • 3袁国良 刘树成.上市公司股权激励的实证分析及其相关问题.中国资本市场前沿理论研究文集[M].社会科学文献出版社,2000..
  • 4J·弗雷德·威斯通.兼并、重组戌公司控制[M].经济科学出版社,1998..
  • 5J·弗雷德·威斯通.《兼并、重组与公司控制》[M].经济科学出版社,1998..
  • 6Lipton, M , Lorsch, J. A Model Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance. Business Lawyer, 1992, 59: 59-77.
  • 7Yermack, D. Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 1996, 40,185-211.
  • 8Goyal, V, Park, C. Board Leadership Structure and CEO Turnover. Working Paper. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, 2000.
  • 9Murphy K. Executive Compensation, in Ed. O Ashenfelter and D Card, Handbook of Labor Economics, 1999, Vol. Ⅲ, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  • 10Core J E , Guay W R , Larcker D F. Executive Equity Compensation and Incentives: A Survey. Economic Policy Review (Federal Reserve Bank of New York), 2003, (9): 27-50.

共引文献1503

同被引文献224

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部