期刊文献+

地层电性各向异性对电阻率测井的影响 被引量:8

Influence of the Electrically Anisotropic Formation on Resistivity Logging
下载PDF
导出
摘要 测井解释中的各种公式和理论大多建立在地层各向同性的基础上,过去的井眼都是以直井为主,这些公式、理论几乎能够满足生产的需要。随着定向井在生产中的地位逐渐提升,地层电性各向异性的影响也逐渐凸现出来。通过各种模型的正演模拟,可以看出地层电性各向异性对定向井,特别是大斜度井和水平井的测井响应影响较大,并且各向异性地层的电阻率值随着井斜角或各向异性地层中交错层理倾角的增大而增大,但总是介于hσ和(σhσV)1/2之间的。同时根据测井曲线上的一些组合响应,可以判断出井下各向异性地层的存在与否。电性各向异性的存在使以往经典的Ar-chie公式从标量形式拓展到张量形式,但同时也增加了求解的复杂性。 Most of the formulae and theories in logging interpretation are on the basis of isotropy of formation. Because the holes are mainly vertical in the past, these formulae and theories can almost meet the demands of the production. However, the influence of the electrically anisotropic formation emerges gradually along with the importance of directional well in the production. Through the forward modeling for a great variety of models, it is revealed that the electrically anisotropic formation greatly influences the logging responses to the directional wells, especially to the highly deviated wells and the horizontal wells. The resistivity of the electrically anisotropic formation increases along with the dip angle increasing and is always between the value σh and (σhσv)^1/2. According to the combination responses on the logging curves, we can know whether the electrically anisotropic formation exist in the hole or not. The existence of the electrical anisotropy makes the classic Archie formula from the scalar quantity to the tensor, and the complexity of solving the problem is also increasing.
出处 《测井技术》 CAS CSCD 2005年第6期502-504,共3页 Well Logging Technology
基金 四川省重点学科建设项目(SZD0414)
关键词 电阻率测井 各向异性 水平电阻率 垂向电阻率 定向井 resistivity logging anisotropy horizontal resistivity vertical resistivity directional well
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献27

  • 1汪宏年,张文生,谢靖.层状介质中重力、地震联合反演的迭代算法[J].石油地球物理勘探,1993,28(2):153-165. 被引量:16
  • 2汪宏年 杨善德.各向异性地层中微球型聚焦测井的正演模拟及其响应特征[J].地球物理学报,1999,42.
  • 3汪宏年 李舟波 等.地球物理测井综合高分辨处理系统及其应用[J].测井技术,1993,17(6):647-656.
  • 4Kunz K S and Moran J H. Some Effects of Formation Anisotropy on Resistivity Measurements in boreholes. Geophysics, 1958, 23:770-794.
  • 5Morn J H and Gianzero S. Effects of Formation Anisotropy on Resistivity Logging Measurements Geophysics, 1979,44,( 7): 1266-1286.
  • 6Klein J D, Martin P R and Alien D E. The petrophysics of Electrically Anisotropic Reservoirs In: Transactions of the SPWLA 36th Annual Logging Symposium, Paris, France,June 26-29, 1995,paper HH.
  • 7Hasiwam T and Zea H. Identifying and Quantifying Resistivity Anisotropy in Vertical Boreholes. In. Transactions of the 40th SPWLA Annual Logging Symposium, Oslo, Norway, May 30-June 3, 1999,paper ZZ.
  • 8Chemali R, Cfianzero S and Su S M. The Effect of Shale Anisotropy on Focused Resistivity Devices. In: Transactions of the SPWLA 28th Annual Logging Symposium, London,England, June 30-July 2, 1987, paper H.
  • 9Anderson B, Barber T and Litiling M. The Response of Induction Tools to Dipping Anisotropic Formations. In: Transactions of the SPWLA 36th Annual Logging Symposium,Pads, France, June 26-29, 1995, paper D.
  • 10Kriegshauser B F, Fanini O N, Forgang S, Mollison R A,et al.. Increased Oil in Place in Low Resistivity Reservoirs from Multicomponent Induction Log Data. In : 41st Annual Logging Symposium Transactions, Society of Professional Well Log Analysts, 2000:1-14.

共引文献74

同被引文献49

引证文献8

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部