期刊文献+

知识背景对归纳推理的影响 被引量:3

Influence of knowledge context on inductive inference
下载PDF
导出
摘要 归纳推理研究领域出现了一些引人注目的实验研究:Heit和Rubinstein等的研究表明了知识背景对归纳推理存在不可忽视的影响;Med in等以“相关,”Loman等以“一致性”作为变量的研究,比较系统地探讨了知识背景对归纳推理的影响;对于这些实验研究结果,假设评价模型、贝叶斯模型、PPP模型以及相关理论都分别能够做出部分的解释;在对上述理论模型进行评价的基础上,提出了利用贝叶斯网络解释知识背景对归纳推理的影响的观点。 In recent years, there are some attractive experiments in the study of inductive inference : & Rubinstein, Lopez etc, Proffitt etc have suggested that the influence of knowledge context should not be ignored;by using the variables of relevance in the study of Medin and using the variables of coherence in the study of Sloman and Rehder relatively , such influenceis systematically discussed. Hypothesis - assessment model, Bayesian model, PPP model, relevance theory could explain such influence partly. On the ground of evaluation, this article puts forward Bayesian network to interpret the influence of knowledge context on inductive inference.
出处 《重庆工商大学学报(自然科学版)》 2005年第6期635-640,共6页 Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University:Natural Science Edition
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(30370488) 西南师范大学国家级重点学科建设项目(西国重04019 西国重04006)
关键词 归纳推理 知识背景 实验研究 理论模型 贝叶斯网络 inductive inference knowledge context experimental study theory model Bayesian network
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1BARRYS 周晓亮 刘建荣 译.休谟[M].济南:山东人民出版社,1992..
  • 2刘生庆.归纳逻辑-从古典向现代类型的演进[M].成都:四川大学出版社,1991..
  • 3OSHERSON D M, SMITH E E, WILKIE O,et al. Category-based induction[J].Psychological Review,1997: 185-200.
  • 4HEIT E,RUBINSTEIN J. Similarity and property effects in inductive reasoning[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1994,20: 411-422.
  • 5LOPEZ A, ATRAN S, COLEY J D, et al. The tree of life: Universal and cultural features of folkbiological taxonomies and inductions[J].Cognitive Psychology, 1997,32:251-295.
  • 6PROFFITT J B, COLEY J D, MEDIN D L. Expertise and category-based induction[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,2000,26:811-828.
  • 7MEDIN D L, COLEY J D, STORMS G,et al. A relevance theory of induction[J]. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,2003,3:16-517.
  • 8SLOMAN S A.Explanatory coherence and the induction of properties[J]. Thinking & Reasoning, 1997, 3:81-110.
  • 9REHDER B,HASTIE R. Category coherence and category-based property induction[J]. Congniton,2004,91:113-153.
  • 10MCDONALD J, SAMUELS M, RISPIOLI J. A hypothesis-assessment model of categorical argument strength[J]. Cognition, 1996, 59: 199-217.

二级参考文献17

  • 1余长慧 潘和平.贝叶斯网络结构学习:用于数据挖掘和知识发现[J].武汉大学学报:信息科学版,2002,:38-40.
  • 2Nisbett R E, Krantz D H, Jepson C, Kunda Z. The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning. Psychological Review, 1983, 90:339~363
  • 3Osherson D N, Smith E E, Wilkie O, Lopez A, Shafir E. Category-based Induction. Psychological Review, 1990, 97:185~200
  • 4Lopez A, Gelman S A, Gutheil G, Smith E E. The development of category-based induction. Child Development, 1992, 63:1070~1090
  • 5McDonald J, Samuels M, Rispoli J. A hypothesis-assessment model of categorical argument strength. Cognition, 1996, 59:199~217
  • 6Carey S. Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 1985
  • 7Choi I, Nisbett R E, Smith E E. Culture, category salience, and inductive reasoning. Cognition, 1997, 65:15~32
  • 8Lopez A, Atran S, Coley J D, Medin D L, Smith E E. The tree of life: Universal and cultural features of folkbiological taxonomies andinductions. Cognitive Psychology, 1997, 32:251~295
  • 9Heit E, Hahn U. Diversity-Based Reasoning in Children. Cognitive Psychology, 2001, 43:243~273
  • 10Gelman S A. The development of induction within natural kind and artifact categories. Cognitive Psychology, 1988, 20:65~95

共引文献41

同被引文献46

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部