期刊文献+

智能设计理论提倡信息复杂性:不是伪科学

Theory of Intelligent Design advocating the Complexity of Information instead of Pseudo science
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国学术界在给Dembski的十条“罪名”中,没有一条说他在搞伪科学。其中,最严厉的批评说:ID理论“根本不是科学”,是非科学。实际上,Dembski在美国几乎公认是难得的才子。他获得数学和哲学两个博士学位,分别在数学、物理和计算机领域内三次从事博士后研究。他用数学理论证明生物系统的“特殊复杂性”不可能来自外部原因和随机变化。从科学与伪科学的划界的角度,论述ID理论不是伪科学;并且指出ID理论的核心是信息复杂性,物质科学范式的标准不适合ID理论,ID理论是发展中的信息时代进化论。 No one said Dembski is engaging in pseudo science among the ten accusations given to him by American academe. The most severely criticism is that the Intelligent is legalized Design Theory is absolutely non - science. Actually, Dembski a preeminent genius in America. He received two doctor He engaged in the postdoctoral respective in mathematics and philosophy. research of mathematics, physics and computer science. He proves unusual complexity of biology system by using mathematic theory, which is impossible to derive from exterior causation and random mutation. It tries to address that ID Theory is not a pseudo science from the angle of differentiating science and pseudo science, and points out the core of ID is the complexity of information; the criterion of material science model is not suitable for ID Theory; ID Theory is a developing evolutionism in the age of information.
出处 《卫生软科学》 2005年第6期391-393,共3页 Soft Science of Health
关键词 进化论 达尔文主义 智能设计 伪科学 Evolutionism Darwinism Intelligent Design Pseudo science
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献13

  • 1马利奥.邦格,张金言.什么是假科学?——只有检验许多特征才能明确区分假科学与科学[J].哲学研究,1987(4):46-51. 被引量:12
  • 2Popper K.Autobiography of Karl Popper[A].Schilpp P.The Philosophy of Karl Popper[C].Illinois: Open Court, 1974.29.
  • 3PopperK.[A]..科学知识进化论[C].北京:三联书店,1987.61-62.
  • 4Kuhn T.Logic of discovery or psychology of Research[A].Lakatos I,Musgrave A.Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge[C].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.1-23.
  • 5Lakatos I.Science and Pseudoscience[A]. Philosophical Papers (Vol. 1)[C].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.1-7.
  • 6陈健.科学划界[M].北京:东方出版社,1997.43-44.
  • 7FeyerabendP.反对方法[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1992..
  • 8Feyerabend P.How to defend society against Science[A].Klemke E D,et al.Introductory Readings in the Philosophy of Science[C].New York: Prometheus Books( 3rd ed.),1998.57.
  • 9Thagard P.Computational Philosophy of Science[M].Mass: MIT Press, 1988.170.
  • 10(英)伊·拉卡托斯(ImreLakatos)著,兰征.科学研究纲领方法论[M]上海译文出版社,1999.

共引文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部