摘要
目前,很多人将智能设计和神创论混为一谈,针对这种现象,本文阐明了二者的来源、发展及其本质,并从研究者知识结构、研究的方法和目的、对生命起源和生命过程的解释三方面进行了区别比较。此外,本文分析了产生这种误解的根源,其一是神创论捍卫者的一厢情愿,其二是自然主义无神论者的过度敏感,第三是智能设计本身的缺陷。最后指出智能设计运动的发展方向,包括三方面:一是进一步批驳达尔文进化论的缺陷;二是借助现代信息学完善理论体系;三是寻找科学证据。如此,划清智能设计和神创论的界限。
At present, a lot of people confused Intelligent Design with Creationism, and they considered that intelligent design is to support creationism or it is a disguised creationism. In addition, conclavist also suppoas intelligent design Aimed at this phenomenon, it clarifies origin, development and nature of these two theories and compares them from three aspects: structure of pursuer knowledge, the method and goal of research as well as life origin and course. Moreover, it also analyzed the origins of misunderstanding. Firstly, creationism owns wishful thinking. Secondly, the atheism is oversensitive. Thirdly, the intelligent design has shortage itself. There include two issues, one is the disputation of pseudoscience another is hard to answer who designer is and how they work, which clue to the system of theory is not complete and can not be proved. Finally, It points out the direction of ID movement, which firstly is to criticize the shortage of Darwinism; and then to improve the system of theory relying on modern informatics; last to find the scientific evidence, which to make a clear distinction between ID and creationism.
出处
《卫生软科学》
2005年第6期394-398,共5页
Soft Science of Health
关键词
智能设计
神创论
自然神学
自然主义无神论
intelligent design
creationism
natural theology
atheistic naturalism