期刊文献+

美国教育券政策选择的两难困境、原因及启示 被引量:2

Dilemma,Reasons and Enlightenment of Educational Voucher Policy in the US
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国教育券政策面临的主要困境是不同政策群体在教育券政策目标认同、政策合法性和政策可行性上存在严重分歧。而根源在于不同政策理念的抵牾、不同利益集团的角力、三权分立政治体制的掣肘以及教育券政策自身局限性限制。美国的案例为我们确定教育券政策目标取向、选择什么样的政策方式和手段提供了借鉴。 What American educational voucher policy is faced with is the great disagreements between different policy groups in the recognition of the objective, legality and feasibility of educational voucher policy, and the root causes are such as the conflictions between different policies, struggle between different groups of interests, impediment caused by the political system of three separate rights and the limitations of the educational voucher policy. We can learn from what US has done in determining the objective orientation of educational voucher policy and in choosing what ways and methods of policy.
作者 李海生
出处 《教育理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第12期51-54,共4页 Theory and Practice of Education
关键词 教育券 政策选择 合法性 可行性 目标取向 educational voucher choice of policy legality feasibility objective orientation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1David A. DeSchryver. Private Scholarship Programs: A Matter of Priorities CER Action Paper August 1, 1999.
  • 2Witte, Sterr, and Thorn, Fifth - Year Report. Milwaukee Parental Choice Program. http://dpls. dacc. wisc. edu/hoice/choice_rep95. html.
  • 3Greene, Paul E. Peterson, and Jiangtao Du, "Effectiveness of School Choice: The Milwaukee Experiment. ".
  • 4The 1997 Annual Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup Poll of Public's Attitudes Toward the Public Schools.
  • 5Margaret Hadderman, Trends and Issues: School Choice,Clearinghouse on Educational Policy and Management, University of Oregon.
  • 6Beales, Janet R., Meeting the Challenge: How the Private Sector Serves Difficult to Educate Students, 1996, Reason Foundation.

同被引文献16

  • 1汪柱旺.教育券、教育选择与教育公平[J].当代财经,2004(12):39-41. 被引量:5
  • 2丁华,周超,张惠.教育券制度的理论与实践性分析[J].辽宁教育研究,2006(11):41-42. 被引量:4
  • 3胡源源,胡青.教育券的教育公平探讨[J].江西教育学院学报,2006,27(5):50-52. 被引量:5
  • 4胡源源 胡青.教育券的教育公平探讨.江西教育学院学报(社会科学版),2004,(10):52-52.
  • 5Giorgio Brunello, and Daniele Checchi. School Vouchers Italian Style, Discussion Paper No. 1475, 2005( 1 ).
  • 6Witte, Sterr, and Thorn, Fifth-Year Report. Milwaukee Paren- tal Choice Program. [EB/ol]. http://dpls.dacc.wisc.edu/hoice/choice rep95.html.
  • 7Greene, Paul E.Peterson, and Jiangtao Du, Effectiveness of School Choice: The Milwaukee Experiment.
  • 8Figlio, D. and Stone, J., School choice and student perfor- mance: are private sehoolsreally better? [M]. Institute for Researcb on Poverty Discussion 1997.
  • 9Vandenberghe, V. and Robin, S.. 2004, Evaluating the effec- tiveness of private educationacross countries : a comparison of methods, [J]. Labour Economics, 2004.
  • 10Bertola, G., and Cheechi, D., Sorting and private education in Italy, in Checchi, D., and Lucifora, C. (eds.). [M]. Education, Training and Labour market outcomes in Europe, Palgrave, 2004.

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部