摘要
采用三次文献法和专家访谈法,对蹦床的两个称谓“规定动作”和“第一套动作”进行探讨和分析。结果表明:到目前为止,相当数量的蹦床界内人士对“第一套动作”称谓的表述还没有根据规则的变化和项目的发展及时进行更改,对“第一套动作”的本质缺乏哲学思辩角度意义上的理解。这种思维惯势如果继续存在,将不利于我国蹦床运动的发展和进步。希望引起有关人士对蹦床“第一套动作”准确称谓的重视,使之对蹦床项目的理解更加深刻,并为蹦床理论研究提供有益的借鉴。
This paper discusses and analyzes two names of “Compulsory” and “the First Routine” of trampoline by the methods of documentation of three times and expert interview. The result shows that so far quite a few persons involvedin trampoline don't change the name of “Compulsory” into “the First Routine” with the development of this event and the changes of the Code of Points. They don't consider the essence of “the First Routine”philosophically. It is not good for the development of trampoline if this thought continues for along time. The writer hopes that persons involvedin trampoline value the name of “the First Routine”and understand deeply this event by reading this paper. The researches on trampoline theory can get some help from this paper.
出处
《沈阳体育学院学报》
2005年第6期103-105,共3页
Journal of Shenyang Sport University
关键词
蹦床
第一套动作
规定动作
称谓
trampoline
the First Routine
compulsory
name