期刊文献+

上市后药物经济学评价方法(Ⅰ)——建立经济学评价框架,评价经济学证据(英文) 被引量:3

An Introduction to Methods for Economic Evaluation of Marketed Medicines I: Setting up an Economic Framework and Reviewing Existing Evidence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 药品是中国重要的卫生资源。尽管上市前药品研究已受到相当重视,但对上市后药品的实际问题关注较少。合理使用和分配上市后药品资源是中国的决策者面临的主要问题之一。经济学评价作为优化分配和使用药品的有效工具现已得到公认。本文介绍了上市后药物的经济学评价方法与原则。上市后药物的经济学评价根据证据的有效性和数量分为三种情况,并相应地采取不同的研究方法。但上市后药物经济学评价方法应采取标准路径。此外,本文还介绍了建立经济学评价框架和评价经济学证据的方法,特别是针对同类药物的评价方法。 Medichie is a very important health resource in Chins Although numerous efforts are paid to pre-marketed medicines, little is done to address practical problems in marketed medicines. The rational use and allocation of marketed medicines remain a major concern for decision-makers in China. It has been recognized that economic evaluation is an efficient tool for priotiting the choice, and optimizing the use of medicines. This paper has explored the methods and principles for conducting econonfic evaluathm of marketed medicines Different strategies will be adopted for economic evidence for marketed medicines in terms of adequacy and suficiency. However, a standard study pathway should be applied in economic evaluanon of marketed medicines. Besides, the aspects for developing economic framework and the methods for reviewing existing economic evidence are also introduced in this paper, particularly, for marketed medicines within the same therapeutic group.
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 2005年第12期944-949,共6页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
关键词 经济学评价 成本-效果 药物评价 循证医学 Economic evaluation Cost-benefit Drug evaluation Evidence-based medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Fox AW.Phase II and phase III clinical studies.In:Fletcher AJ,Edwards L,Fox AW,Stonier P eds.Principles and practices of pharmaceutical medicine.John Wiley & Sons,Ltd.2002
  • 2Edwards R,Olsson S.WHO Programme - Global Monitoring.In:Mann RD,Andrews EB.Pharmacovigilance.John Wiley & Sons,Ltd.2002.
  • 3Johnson-Pratt LR.Phase IV drug development:post-marketing studies.In:Fletcher AJ,Edwards L,Fox AW,Stonier P eds.Principles and practices of pharmaceutical medicine.John Wiley & Sons,Ltd.2002.
  • 4Che MF,Han BS.The preparation and implementation of essential medicines list in China.Chinese Pharmaceutical Issues.2000;14(1):19-21.
  • 5Xu FK.The selection of essential medicines in China.Chinese Hospital Management.1997;17(4):23-24.
  • 6Li SL,Cao LY,Xiao AL,Yan L,Lan F.Evidence-based evaluation of essential medicines.Chinese Pharmaceutical Issues.2003;17(6):337-339.
  • 7Data from OECD Health Database.Available from http://www.euro.who.int/document/e73096.pdf.
  • 8Data from the Chinese Ministry of Health.Available from:http://61.49.18.68/statistics/digest03/t33.htm.
  • 9Sun X,Li YP,Cao LY,Wiffen P.A perspective of evidence-based medicine on post-marketing drug evaluation in China:present,problems and strategies.The 8th Global Health Forum.Mexico City,Mexico.2004.
  • 10Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment.Guidelines for economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals:Canada.2nd Edition.November 1997.

同被引文献20

  • 1于嘉,谢雁鸣.影响卫生经济学评价的因素分析[J].中国中医药信息杂志,2009,16(S1):121-123. 被引量:7
  • 2杨志勇,王梅,吴华章.肝炎疫苗干预的经济学评价研究现状与问题[J].中国卫生经济,2006,25(8):56-58. 被引量:8
  • 3Shemilt I, Mugford M, Byford S. Incorporating economics evidence. In: Higgins JPT, Green S. Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 5.0.0). 2008. http://www.cochranehandbook.org/.
  • 4Mugford M. Using Systematic Reviews for Economic Evaluations. Systematic Reviews in Health Care. London: BMJ Publishing, 2001.
  • 5Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, UK. NHS economic evaluation database handbook. 2007.
  • 6Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/ crdweb.
  • 7Cochrane library, http://www.thecochranelibrary.org.
  • 8Cost-effectiveness analysis registry. Harvard University. https:// research.tufts-nemc.org/cear/default.aspx.
  • 9Drummond MF, Stoddardt GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987, p18-38.
  • 10Drummond MF, Jefferson TO. Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. The BMJ Economic Evaluation Working Party. BMJ, 1996, 313(7052): 275-283.

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部