摘要
目的比较不同剂量的芬太尼复合异丙酚、咪唑安定在胃镜检查中的镇静程度及对呼吸循环的影响。方法选择门诊无痛胃镜患者400例(ASAⅠ、Ⅱ级)随机分为4组:A组即对照组(异丙酚1.20mg/kg+咪唑安定0.04mg/kg),B组(异丙酚1.20mg/kg+咪唑安定0.02mg/kg+芬太尼0.50μg/kg),C组(异丙酚1.20mg/kg+咪唑安定0.02mg/kg+芬太尼1.00μg/kg),D组(异丙酚1.20mg/kg+咪唑安定0.02mg/kg+芬太尼1.50μg/kg)各100例。观察术中HR、MAP、SpO2及镇静程度、呼吸抑制、清醒时间等。结果4组基础HR、MAP、SpO2值差异无显著性(P>0.05)。B、C和D组与A组比较经咽MAP值差异有显著性(P<0.05,P<0.01),各组间查胃MAP值差异无显著性(P>0.05)。B、C和D组经咽HR值及查胃HR值与A组比较差异有显著性(P<0.01)。A、B和C3组经咽SpO2值及查胃SpO2值差异无显著性(P>0.05)。D组经咽SpO2值及查胃SpO2值与A组相比差异有显著性(P<0.01)。B、C和D3组呛咳病人显著少于A组(P<0.01),C、D组躁动病人显著少于A组(P<0.05,P<0.01),D组呼吸抑制病人显著多于A组(P<0.05)。结论异丙酚1.20mg/kg+咪唑安定0.02mg/kg复合芬太尼0.50 ̄1.00μg/kg用于胃镜检查安全且效果最佳,为无痛胃镜术的最佳方案。
[Objective] To compare the effect on sedation,respiration and circulation of different doses of Fentanyl with Propofol and Midazolam used in gastroscopy. [Methods] 400 patients(ASA grade Ⅰ , Ⅱ ) undergoning gastroscopy were randomly divided into four groups: GroupA(Propofol 1.2 mg/kg+ Midazolam 0.04 mg/kg); Group B (Propofol 1.2 mg/kg+ Midazolam 0.02 mg/kg + Fentanyl 0.5 ug/kg); Group C (Propofol 1.2 mg/kg+ Midazolam 0.02 mg/kg + Fentanyl 1.0 mg/kg); Group D (Propofol 1.2 mg/kg+ Midazolam 0.02 mg/kg + Fentanyl 1.5 ug/kg). HR, MAP, SpO2, grade of sedation, respiratory inhibition, time for recovery of consciousness were recorded. [Results] The MAP of B, C, D passing through the larynx were significantly lower than A (P〈0.05, P〈0.01), the HR of B, C, D passing through the larynx and checking the stomach were significantly lower than A (P 〈0.01), the SpO2 of D was significantly lower than A (P 〈0.01), the restlessness in C, D were better than in A (P 〈0.05, P 〈0.01), the coughing patients in B, C, D were less than in A (P 〈0.01), the respiratory inhibiting patients in D were more than in A (P 〈 0.05). [Conclusion] Propofol 1.2 mg/kg, Midazolam 0.02 mg/kg,and Fentanyl 0.5-1.0 ug/kg were safe and most effective in Gastroscopy.
出处
《中国内镜杂志》
CSCD
北大核心
2005年第11期1154-1155,1165,共3页
China Journal of Endoscopy
关键词
芬太尼
不同剂量
胃镜
fentanyl
different doses
gastroscopy