期刊文献+

咽后淋巴结对鼻咽癌预后影响的研究 被引量:6

Prognostic Significance of Retropharyngeal Lymphadenopathy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]分析咽后淋巴结转移对鼻咽癌预后的影响。[方法]收集1999年1月至1999年12月间中山大学肿瘤防治中心放疗科收治、经病理证实的初诊鼻咽癌749例并进行分析。[结果]咽后淋巴结的发生率51.5%。单因素分析显示咽后淋巴结对鼻咽癌总生存率及无远处转移生存率的影响有统计学意义(P<0.001)。多因素分析显示咽后淋巴结转移并不是影响鼻咽癌生存率的独立预后因素,但对无远处转移生存率的影响接近有统计学意义(P=0.053)。对于N0患者,咽后淋巴结转移对鼻咽癌总生存率、无远处转移生存率及无局部区域复发生存率的影响均有统计学意义(P值分别为0.007、0.023和0.008)。[结论]基于鼻咽癌增强CT资料,咽后淋巴结转移对鼻咽癌无远处转移生存率可能有影响,是影响无颈部淋巴结转移的鼻咽癌患者的独立预后因素。 [Purpose]To investigate the prognostic value of retropharyngeal lymphadenopathy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. [Methods]Between January 1999 and December 1999, 749 of cases of untreated metastasis-free NPC patients, histologically diagnosed, presented at the Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University. [Results]The incidence of retropharyngeal lymphadenopathy was 51.5%. In univariate analysis, the significant differences in overall survival (OS) and distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) were found between patient with or without retropharyngeal lymphadenopathy(P〈0.001, P〈 0.001,respectively), however, the present of retropharyngeal lymphadenopathy was not independent predictor for survival in multivariate analysis, marginal significant difference was observed in DMFS (P=0.053)o In NO disease, the present of retropharyngeal lymphadenopathy was significant independent predictor for OS, locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS) and DMFS (P=0.007,0.023 and 0.008, respectively). [Conclusion]Based on the enhanced CT imaging, the retropharyngeal lymphadenopathy had the tendency to affect the DMFS. It was an independent predictor for survival and metastasis in NO disease.
出处 《中国肿瘤》 CAS 2005年第12期815-818,共4页 China Cancer
基金 国家自然科学基金(30470505) 广东省科学技术厅项目(2004B50301005) 广州市科技局科技攻关引导项目(2004Z3-E0451)
关键词 鼻咽肿瘤 咽后淋巴结 预后 nasopharyngeal neoplasm retropharyngeal lymphadenopathy prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Lam WWM, Chan YL, Leung SF, et al. Retropharyngeal lymphadenopathy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. Head Neck, 1997,19:176-181.
  • 2McLaughlin MP, Mendenhall WM, Mancuso AA, et al.Retropharyngeal adenopathy as a predictor of outcome in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. [J]. Head Neck, 1995, 17:190-198.
  • 3Chua DTT,Sham JST, Kwong DLW, et al. Retrophayrngeal lymphadenopathy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. Cancer 1997, 79: 869-877.
  • 4肖光莉,徐国镇,高黎,李素艳,肖建平,蔡伟明,秦德兴.鼻咽癌咽旁间隙受侵对预后的影响[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2001,23(3):244-246. 被引量:36
  • 5Andrew van Hasselt. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma [M]. Second edition. HongKong:The Chinese University Press,1999.127-160.
  • 6Sham JS, Cheung YK, Choy D,et al. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: CT evaluation of pattern of tumor spread[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 1991, 12:265-270.
  • 7Mancuso AA, Harnsberger HR, Muraki AS, et al. Computed tomography of cervical and retropharyngeal lymph nodes: normal anatomy, variants of normal, and applications in staging head and neck cancer, part Ⅰ: Normal anatomy[J]. Radiology, 1983, 148:709-714.
  • 8Mancuso AA, Harnsberger HR, Muraki AS, et al. Computed tomography of cervical and retropharyngeal lymph nodes: normal anatomy, variants of normal, and applications in staging head and neck cancer, part Ⅱ: Pathology[J]. Radiology, 1983, 148: 715-723.
  • 9Van den Brekel MW, Stel HV, Castelijns JA, et al. Cervical lymph node metastasis: assessment of radiologic criteria[J]. Radiology, 1990,177(2): 379-384.
  • 10孙颖,马骏,卢泰祥,王岩,黄莹,唐玲珑.512例鼻咽癌颈淋巴结转移规律的研究[J].癌症,2004,23(z1):1523-1527. 被引量:57

二级参考文献33

  • 1刘泰福,徐国镇.全国鼻咽癌会议纪要[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,1992,0(4):5-10. 被引量:132
  • 2汪卫东,罗济程,邱蔚六,孙大熙.头颈部恶性肿瘤隐匿性颈淋巴结转移的CT诊断[J].中华放射学杂志,1995,29(8):543-546. 被引量:12
  • 3田野,宋建荣,钱铭辉.鼻咽癌放疗前后转移淋巴结的MRI分析[J].实用放射学杂志,1996,12(9):523-526. 被引量:3
  • 4管迅行,张恩罴,王启华.鼻咽癌淋巴系统扩散的临床探讨[J].实用癌症杂志,1996,11(4):241-243. 被引量:4
  • 5[1]Robbins KT, Medina JE, Wolfe GT, et al. Standardizing neck dissection terminology. Official report of the academy's committee for head and neck surgery and oncology [J]. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 1991, 117 (6): 601 - 605.
  • 6[2]Robbins KT. Integrating radiological criteria into the classification of cervical lymph node disease [J]. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 1999, 125(4): 385 -387.
  • 7[3]Robbins KT, Clayman G, Levine PA, et al. Neck dissection classification update: revisions proposed by the American Head and Neck Society and the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery [J]. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2002; 128(7): 751 -758.
  • 8[4]Gregoire V, Coche E, Cosnard G, et al. Selection and delineation of lymph node target volumes in head and neck conformal radiotherapy. Proposal for standardizing terminology and procedure based on the surgical experience [J]. Radiother Oncol, 2000, 56(2): 135 - 150.
  • 9[5]Nowak PJ, Wijers OB, Lagerwaard FJ, et al. A three dimensional CT-based target definition for elective irradiation of the neck [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1999, 45(1): 33 -39.
  • 10[6]Gregoire V, Levendag P, Ang KK, et al. CT-based delineation of lymph node levels and related CTVs in the node-negative neck:DAHANCA, EORTC, GORTEC, NCIC, RTOG consensusguidelines [ J]. Radiother Oncol, 2003, 69 (3): 227 - 236.

共引文献107

同被引文献74

引证文献6

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部