摘要
回应型司法的权力和权利关系为具有后现代意味的刑事契约的生成提供了政治和法律制度环境,对社会主体多元化利益诉求的回应为其提供了社会民间化解纷的民众动力。我国移植刑事契约缺乏传统法文化的的历史支持,现存的社会急剧变革时期共存的多种社会秩序也不能为刑事契约所适宜的权力与权利结构奠定政治制度和法律制度基础,因此刑事契约的本土化借鉴应该谨慎。
The power-right structure of the responsive justice furnishes the political and legal system conditions which create the criminal contract of post-modernism, and at the same time, the flexible judicial response to multiplex interest plea of the society produces demotic foundation of civil mechanism of dispute resolving. Transplant the criminal contract in China is imprudent because not only of the absence of historical aid of traditionally legal culture of China but also of the immaturity of the social and legal conditions existent in the co-existing varieties of social orders in the period of drastic social reformation.
出处
《国家检察官学院学报》
2005年第6期15-19,共5页
Journal of National Prosecutors College
关键词
回应型司法
刑事契约
本土化质疑
responsive justice criminal contract question on localization