期刊文献+

紫色土小流域土壤流失对不同土地利用类型的响应 被引量:9

Response of soil loss to different land use types in small watersheds of purple soil
下载PDF
导出
摘要 小流域土壤流失特征不仅反映了流域的土地利用和管理状况,而且对其下游水体环境和水利设施安全具有深刻的影响。1999—2000年间以紫色土区3个具有不同集水面积、物理特征和土地利用类型的典型小流域为研究对象,探讨不同雨型下土壤流失对不同土地利用类型的响应特征。中大型降雨和间歇型降雨侵蚀下,以林地为主要土地利用类型的流域输沙模数最小,平均为866 kg·hm-2,谷地农田利用类型最高,平均为5 550 kg·hm-2。次降雨侵蚀力和次降雨峰值径流流量,分别是紫色土区非林地和林地利用为主小流域输沙模数变异的主要影响因子。 Soil erosion characteristics of small watersheds not only reflect land use and management condition of watersheds, but also determine the safety of water body environment and water conservancy establishment in the lower reaches of river. Three small watersheds with different catchments area, physical characteristics and land use type were employed to investigate the responding characteristics of soil erosion under different storm types and land use types from 1999 to 2000 in the purple soil area, Results showed that the sediment transport modulus over the woodland-dominated watershed is the least under the erosion of ML-type precipitation and IM- type precipitation. The average modulus is 866 kg· hm^- 2. In contrast, the modulus over the farmland - domi- nated watershed is the highest with a mean modulus of 5 550 kg·hm^- 2. In addition, the total rainfall erosive factor and the total peak flow amount were proved to be the main influential factors of the variation of the sediment transport modulus for watersheds with various landscape structures and farmland-dominated landscapes, and woodland - dominated watersheds, respectively.
出处 《中国水土保持科学》 CSCD 2005年第4期37-41,共5页 Science of Soil and Water Conservation
基金 国家自然科学基金项目""(40371075)中欧合作研究项目""(EROCHiNut-ERBIC18CT980372)
关键词 紫色土 土地利用 输沙模数 purple soil land use sediment transport modulus
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1余剑如.长江上游的水土流失与河流泥沙[J].水土保持学报,1988,(1):1-16.
  • 2[3]Foy R H,Kirk M.Agriculture and Water Quality:A Regional Study.Journal of the Chartered Institution of Water and Environmental Management,1995,9(3):247-256
  • 3蔡强国,吴淑安.紫色土陡坡地不同土地利用对水土流失过程的影响[J].水土保持通报,1998,18(2):1-8. 被引量:64
  • 4[5]Tapia-Vargas M,Tiscareno-Lopez M,Oropeza-Mota J L,et al.Runoff and sediment yields simulation under five-soil management practices.Agrochemical,2000,34 (6):663-675
  • 5[6]Backstorm M.Sediment transport in grassed swales during simulated runoff events.Water Science Technology,2002,45(7):41-49
  • 6[7]Pathak P,Wani S P,Singh P,et al.Sediment flow behavior from small agricultural watersheds.Agricultural water management,2004,67(2):105-117
  • 7[8]Bruno Merza,Andra's Ba'rdossyb.Effects of spatial variability on the rainfall runoff process in a small loess catchment.Journal of Hydrology,1998,212(3):304-317
  • 8[10]Onstad C A,Foster G R.Erosion modeling on a watershed.Transactions of the ASAE,1975,18(2):288-292
  • 9[11]Foster G R,Meyer L D,Onstad C A.A runoff erosivity factor and variable slope length exponents for soil loss estimates.Transactions of the ASAE,1977,20(4):683-687
  • 10[12]Dendy F E,Bolton G C.Sediment yield-runoff drainage area relationships in the United States.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,1976,31:264-266

二级参考文献3

共引文献69

同被引文献117

引证文献9

二级引证文献216

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部