期刊文献+

高职学生主观幸福感及其影响因素研究 被引量:9

On Subjective Well-Being of Students of Vocational School and Its Influencing Factors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用幸福感指数量表、简易应对方式问卷、自尊量表和领悟社会支持量表对381名学生进行团体测验,探讨高职学生主观幸福感的状况及其与应对方式、自尊、社会支持度之间的关系。结果表明:1、高职生幸福感指数的平均数和标准差为9.76±2.51;城乡差异对总体情感指数有显著影响,性别、专业、年级等因素对主观幸福感无显著影响。2、应对方式与主观幸福感呈中等程度的相关。3、自尊、社会支持度与主观幸福感有中等程度的相关。本研究的结果显示:高职学生能体验到中等程度以上的主观幸福感;来源地、应对方式、自尊、社会支持度是影响主观幸福感的重要因素。 With the aim to explore the subjective well-being (SWB) of students of vocational school and the factors which influence their SWB, 381 students were administered by Index of well-being, index of general affect, simplified coping style questionnaire, the self-esteem scale perceived social support scale. The results are as follows : the mean and Std. Deviation of SWB in students of vocational school is 9. 76 ± 2. 51, urban and rural students differ in the index of general affect but the factors such as sex, major, grade don't influence SWB significantly; SWB shows a correlation with coping styles; SWB is positively correlated with self-esteem and social support. The study concludes that students of vocational education experience more positive SWB, coping styles, self-esteem and social support have remarkable effect on their SWB.
作者 何亚芸 王艳
出处 《昆明冶金高等专科学校学报》 CAS 2005年第6期16-20,共5页 Journal of Kunming Metallurgy College
关键词 主观幸福感 影响因素 差异分析 高职学生 subjective well-being influencing factors difference analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1[1]Diener E,Eunkook MS,Richard E.Subjective Well-Being:Three Decades of Progress [J].Psychological Bulletin,1999,125,(2):276.
  • 2[2]Diener E.,Suh E.Subjective Well-Being and Age:An International Perspective [ J ].Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatics,1997,(17):324-360.
  • 3严标宾,郑雪,邱林.中国大陆、香港和美国大学生主观幸福感比较[J].心理学探新,2003,23(2):59-62. 被引量:57
  • 4汪向东,王希林,马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版).北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999.
  • 5[6]张雯,郑日昌.大学生主观幸福感及其影响因素[M].北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,2004.
  • 6[7]Diener E.Subjective Well-Being[ J ].Psychological Bulletin,1984,95,(3):542-575.
  • 7[9]Weiss R.The Provisions of Social Relationships [ A ].In Rubin Z.Doing Unto Others [ C ].USA:Englewood Cliffs,1974.

二级参考文献9

  • 1Diener E. Assessing subjective well- being: Progress and opportunities[J]. Social Indicators Research, 1994, 31 :103- 157.
  • 2Butler A C, Hokanson J E, Flynn H A. A comparison of self- esteem liability and low trait self- esteem as vulnerability factors for depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994, 66: 166- 77.
  • 3Kennon M Sheldon, Tim kasser. Goals, congruence, and positive well- being: New empirical support or humanistic theories[J]. The Journal of Humanistic Psychology. Beverly Hills, 2001 : 1 - 16.
  • 4Eunkook Suh, Ed Diener, Shigehiro Oishi, Harry C.Triandis. The Shifting of Life Satisfaction Judgments Across Cultures: Emotions Venus Norms[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998,74(2) : 482 -493.
  • 5Diener E, Suh E M. Cuhure and Subjective Well- being[M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.87- 112.
  • 6Diener E, Suh E, Oishi S, Shao L. Norms for Affect:National Comparisons [A ]. Paper presented at the Ninth Conference of International Society for Research on Emotions. Toronto, Canada, 1996.
  • 7Diener E, Suh E M. National differences in subjective well- being [ M]. In D Kahneman, E Diener, N Schwarz, eds., Well- being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. New York: Russell- Stage, 1999.
  • 8Leeakulthanit O, Day R. Cross- cultural comparisons of quality of life of Thais and Americans[J]. Social Indicators Research, 1993, 30: 49- 70.
  • 9Radhakrishnan P, Chan D K S. Cultural differences in the relation between self- discrepancy and life satisfaction[J].International Journal of Psychology, 1997, 32:387 - 98.

共引文献587

同被引文献104

引证文献9

二级引证文献89

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部