期刊文献+

关于语言符号的任意性和非任意性 被引量:3

On Arbitrariness and Non-arbitrariness of the Linguistic Sign
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在语言符号任意性和非任意性的研究中,存在着两个需要商榷的问题:(1)语言的任意性和非任意性到底指什么;(2)任意性和非任意性的关系如何。二者并非水火不容、非此即彼,而是互补共存、相辅相成,在语言的多个层面上共同成为语言组织中的两大功能性原则。 In the studies of arbitrariness and non-arbitrariness of the linguistic sign, two major problems remain to be clarified :( 1 ) What does it mean by arbitrariness and non-arbitrariness in linguistics? The answer to the question will be a prerequisite for discussing all of the relevant issues. As a polysemous notion, arbitrariness is characterized by multiple components and various manifestations. Non-arbitrariness includes iconicity and motivation, and it is in opposition to, and mutually explanatory with arbitrariness. (2)What is the relationship between arbitrariness and non-arbitrariness? They are not diametrically opposed to each other, but dialectically interdependent since both of them are the functional principle of language organization.
作者 李二占
出处 《海南大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 2005年第4期431-434,442,共5页 Journal of Hainan University (Humanities & Social Sciences)
关键词 索绪尔 语言符号 任意性 非任意性 象似性 理据性 Saussure linguistic sign arbitrariness non-arbitrariness iconicity motivation
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1杨炳钧.整合语言学概观[J].外语教学与研究,2004,36(2):105-108. 被引量:12
  • 2[2]LAKOFF G,JOHNSON M.Philosophy in the Flesh[M].New York:Basic Books,1999.464-465.
  • 3[5]SAUSSURE F D.Course in General Linguistics[M].London:Gerald Duckworth Co.Ltd.,1983.66-69.
  • 4[6]HOLDCROFT D.Saussure:Signs,System,and Arbitrariness[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1991.56.
  • 5[10]杰伊.语言心理学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2004.
  • 6魏育邻.如何理解索绪尔的任意性[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2005,28(1):24-28. 被引量:22
  • 7[10]克里斯特尔.现代语言学词典[M].沈家煊译.北京:商务印书馆,2000.24.
  • 8[12]DRESSLER W.Interactions between iconicity and other semiotic parameters in language[ A].SIMONE R.Iconicity in Language[ C].Amsterdam:John Benjamins,1994.21-35.
  • 9[13]ALDERSON S J.Iconicity in literature [ A ].NaNNY M,FISCHER O.Form Miming Meaning:Iconicity in Language and Literature [ C ].Amsterdam:John Benjamins,1999.109-120.
  • 10[14]NEWMEYER F.Language Form and Language Function [ M ].Cambridge:The MIT Press,1998.114.

二级参考文献48

  • 1Joseph, E J 1997. The "language myth" myth: Roy Harris's red herrings [A]. In G Wolf & N Love (eds.). 1997.
  • 2Malinowski, B 1937. The delemma of contemporsry linguistics.Review of M M Lewis (1936), Infant Speech: A Study of the Beginnings of Language [J]. Nature 140: 172-3.
  • 3Pateman, T 1997, Language, art and Kant [A]. In G Wolf & N Love (eds.). 1997.
  • 4Taylor, J R 1995. Linguistic Categorization [M]. (2^nd edition). Oxford; Oxford University Press.
  • 5Taylor, J R 1997. Linguistics theory and the multiple-trace model of memory [A]. In G Wolf & N Love (eds.). 1997.
  • 6Taylor, T J 1997. Roy Harris and the philosophy of linguistics [J]. Language Sciences 19: 1-5.
  • 7Whatmough, J 1957. Language: A Modern Synthesis [M]. New York: Mentor.
  • 8Wittgenstein, L 1978. Philosophical Investigations [M]. Translated by G E M Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • 9Wolf, G & N Love. (eds.). 1997. Linguistics lnside Out: Roy Harris and His Critics [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • 10Baron,N 1997. Contextualizing "context": From Malinowski to machine translation [A]. In G Wolf & N Love (eds.). 1997.

共引文献31

同被引文献33

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部