期刊文献+

Fuel classification and mapping from satellite imagines 被引量:3

Fuel classification and mapping from satellite imagines
下载PDF
导出
摘要 This paper summarizes the fuel type systems currently adopted by the fire danger rating systems or fire behavior prediction systems of some countries, such as Canada, the United States, Australia, Greece, and Switzerland. As an example, the Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System organizes fuel types into five major groups, with a total of 16 discrete fuel types recognized. In the United States National Fire Danger Rating System, fuel models are divided into four vegetation groups and twenty fire behavior fuel models. The Promethus System (Greece) divides fuels into 7 types, and Australia has adopted only three distinct fuel types: open grasslands, dry eucalyptus forests, and heath/shrublands. Four approaches to mapping fuels are acceptable: field reconnaissance, direct mapping methods, indirect mapping methods, and gradient modeling. Satellite remote-sensing techniques provide an alternative source of obtaining fuel data quickly, since they provide comprehensive spatial coverage and enough temporal resolution to update fuel maps in a more efficient and timely manner than traditional aerial photography or fieldwork. Satellite sensors can also provide digital information that can be easily tied into other spatial databases using Geographic Information System (GIS) analysis, which can be used as input in fire behavior and growth models. Various fuel-mapping methods from satellite remote sensing are discussed in the paper. According to the analysis of the fuel mapping techniques worldwide, this paper suggests that China should first create appropriate fuel types for its fire agencies before embarking on developing a national fire danger rating system to improve the current data situation for it's fire management programs. This paper summarizes the fuel type systems currently adopted by the fire danger rating systems or fire behavior prediction systems of some countries, such as Canada, the United States, Australia, Greece, and Switzerland. As an example, the Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System organizes fuel types into five major groups, with a total of 16 discrete fuel types recognized. In the United States National Fire Danger Rating System, fuel models are divided into four vegetation groups and twenty fire behavior fuel models. The Promethus System (Greece) divides fuels into 7 types, and Australia has adopted only three distinct fuel types: open grasslands, dry eucalyptus forests, and heath/shrublands. Four approaches to mapping fuels are acceptable: field reconnaissance, direct mapping methods, indirect mapping methods, and gradient modeling. Satellite remote-sensing techniques provide an alternative source of obtaining fuel data quickly, since they provide comprehensive spatial coverage and enough temporal resolution to update fuel maps in a more efficient and timely manner than traditional aerial photography or fieldwork. Satellite sensors can also provide digital information that can be easily tied into other spatial databases using Geographic Information System (GIS) analysis, which can be used as input in fire behavior and growth models. Various fuel-mapping methods from satellite remote sensing are discussed in the paper. According to the analysis of the fuel mapping techniques worldwide, this paper suggests that China should first create appropriate fuel types for its fire agencies before embarking on developing a national fire danger rating system to improve the current data situation for it's fire management programs.
出处 《Journal of Forestry Research》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2005年第4期311-316,共6页 林业研究(英文版)
基金 This paper was supported by the Beijing Fund of Nature Science (No. 6042025), China NKBRSF Project (No. 2001CB409600) and Laboratory of Forest Protection, State Forestry Administration
关键词 Fire behavior Fire danger Fuel type classification Fuel mapping Fuel model. Fire behavior Fire danger Fuel type classification Fuel mapping Fuel model.
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Agee, J.K. and Pickford, S.G. 1985. Vegetation and Fuel Mapping of North Cascades National Park Service Complex [R]. National Park Serv., Cooperative Park Studies Unit, Univ. Washington, Seattle, WA.
  • 2Anderson, H.E. 1982. Aids to determining fuel models for estimating fire behavior [R]. USDA For. Serv., National Wildfire Coordinating Group, Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-122.
  • 3Andrews, P.L. 1986. BEHAVE: fire behavior prediction and fuel modeling system [R]. Burn subsystem. Part 1. USDA For. Serv., Gen. Tech. Rep.INT-194.
  • 4Brown, J.K. 1982. Fuel and fire behavior prediction in big sagebrush [R]. USDA For. Ser., Res. Pap. INT-290.
  • 5Byram, G.M. 1959. Combustion of forest fuels [C]. In: K.P. Davis (ed.), Forest Fire: Control and Use. New York: McGraw-Hill, 61-89.
  • 6Canadian Forestry Service. 1987. Tables for the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index System [R]. Can. For. Serv., For. Tecb. Rep. No. 25 (4th edition). Ottawa, ON.
  • 7Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Centre. 2002. The 2002 glossary of forest fire management terms. Available at : http://wlapwww.gov.bc.ca/esd/fire-mgmt-gloss-2002.pdf.
  • 8Castro, R., and Chuvieco, E. 1998. Modeling forest fire danger from geographic information systems [J]. Geocarto Int., 13: 15-23.
  • 9Cheney P.1992. A National Fire Danger Rating System for Australia. International Forest Fire News, (No. 6 - January 1992)[OL]. Available at: http://www.fire.uni-freiburg.deliffn/country/au/au 4.htm.
  • 10De Wulf, R.R, Goossens, R.E., Roover, B.E, and Borry, F.C. 1990. Extraction of forest stand parameters from panchromatic and multispectral SPOT-1 data [J]. Int. J. Remote Sens., 11: 1571-1588.

同被引文献48

引证文献3

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部