期刊文献+

消费者选择中后悔和不确定性的作用研究 被引量:15

Study of impacts from regret and uncertainty on consumer choice
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究当消费者对产品绩效的期望不确定性时,后悔如何影响消费选择的动态变化.数学分析和实验结果表明,当消费者观察或体验到的各个产品选项的表现与原先的期望相吻合,风险厌恶型消费者倾向于提高对初始期望绩效不确定性较高的产品的购买意愿,而风险喜好型消费者倾向于降低对该产品的购买意愿.另外,期望绩效水平的不确定性对消费选择的影响会随消费者经验值的增加而减小.研究成果弥补了现有期望差异理论对解释消费行为动态变化的不足.因此,为了更加全面地理解在多选项选择问题中后悔对消费选择的动态影响,管理者需要考虑备选产品在期望绩效水平不确定性上的差异、相关消费市场的顾客风险偏好构成、消费者的购买经验等特征. The paper aims to investigate how consumer choice probability is updated by experienced regret when consumer expectations are viewed as expectations. Theoretically and empirically, we show that when zero disconfirmation is experienced for each alternative in the consideration set, risk-averse consumers tend to increase their choice intention for the alternative with higher performance uncertainty, but risk-seeking consumers tend to decrease their choice intention for this alternative. In addition, the effect of performance uncertainty will be moderated as experience accumulates. The findings provide a great advancement over the expectancy disconfirmation model. Managerially, to gain a better understanding of the impact of regret on changing consumer choice, we should take into account market features such as performance uncertainty between competing alternatives, composition of consumers in terms of their risk attitudes, and consumer experience with the product.
作者 陈荣 贾建民
出处 《管理科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第6期19-26,共8页 Journal of Management Sciences in China
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70502003) 国家杰出青年科学基金(香港 澳门青年学者合作研究基金)资助项目(70229001)
关键词 后悔 期望 不确定性 风险偏好 贝叶斯模型 regret expectation uncertainty risk preference Bayesian model
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Bell D E.Regret in decision making under uncertainty[J].Operations Research,1982,30 (September/October):961-981.
  • 2Loomes G,Sugden R.Regret theory:An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty[J].Economic Journal,1982,92(December):805-824.
  • 3Inman J J,Dyer J S,Jia J.A generalized utility model of disappointment and regret effects on post-choice valuation[J].Marketing Science,1999,16 (2):97-111.
  • 4Inman J J,Zeelenberg M.Regret in repeat purchase versus switching decisions:The attenuating role of decision justifiability[J].Journal of Consumer Research,2002,29 (June):116-128.
  • 5Taylor K A.A regret theory approach to assessing consumer satisfaction[J].Marketing Letters,1997,8 (April):229-238.
  • 6Tsiros M,Mittal V.Regret:A model of its antecedents and consequences in consumer decision making[J].Journal of Consumer Research,2000,26 (March):401-417.
  • 7Zeenlenberg M,Pieters R.Beyond valence in customer dissatisfaction:A review and new findings on behavioral responses to regret and disappointment in Iailed services[J].Journal of Business Research,2004,57 (April):445-455.
  • 8Rust R T,Inman J J,Jia J,et al.What you don' t know about consumer perceived quality:The role of consumer expectation distributions[J].Marketing Science,1999,18 (1):77-92.
  • 9Boulding W,Kalra A,Staelin R.The quality double whammy[J].Marketing Science,1999,18 (4):463-484.
  • 10Anderson E W,Sullivan M W.The antecedents and consequences of consumer satisfaction for firms[J].Marketing Science,1993,12 (Spring):125-143.

同被引文献228

引证文献15

二级引证文献110

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部