论知识产权侵权归责原则

On the Doctrines of Fixation of Liabilities for Infringing upon Intellectual Property Rights

对于知识产权侵权归责原则目前存有三种学说,认为知识产权侵权归责原则应当依据不同的场合确定。对于权利人要求行为人仅承担停止知识产权侵权行为的民事责任,则无须证明行为人有无过错,只有在法律有规定的特定场合,才必须证明行为人具有过错,此乃以无过错责任为原则,以过错责任原则为例外的归责原则;若权利人要求行为人承担损害赔偿责任,则必须证明行为人的过错,只有在法律规定的特定场合,才无须证明行为人的过错, 即以过错责任为原则,以无过错责任为例外。

There exists three theories in explaining thedoctrines of fixation of lisbilities for infringing upon intellectual property rights. A different point of view was put forward in this paper ,suggesting that the doctrines of fixation of liabilities for infringing upon intellectual property rights should be determined according to different situations. Right holders have no neccessity to prove if actors are faulty when the right holders request the actors to desist from infringements,and must prove the fault of the actors only in special cases stipulated by law ,i. e. , taking no-fault liability as the doctrine and fault liability as an exception, Right holders must prove the fault of the actors when the Right holders request the actors to offer compensation for damages, and have no neccessity to prove if the actors are faulty only in special cases stipulated by law,i, e. , taking fault liability as the doctrine and non-fauh liability as an exceotion.