科研项目评估中的同行评议方法研究

Application of Peer Review in Scientific Research Project Evaluation

目前科学研究项目的评估已经得到了世界各国政府和科研管理部门的重视，并在一定程度上开展了此方面的理论研究与实践，科研管理部门和资源分析部门一般将此评估视为一种有效的管理手段。同行评议方法是在科研项目评估中使用较多的方法，公正高效的同行评议方法是保证科学研究质量的基础。文章介绍了科研项目评估中同行评议方法的地位和使用现状，通过对同行评议中的规则和潜规则的讨论，包括权威的影响以及匿名制等的影响，为制定科研政策提供依据。

Most governments have attached great importance to the scientific research project evaluation throughout the world, which has yielded much practical theories. To a wide extent, the evaluation is seen as an effective management strategy by managers of both tech administration and resources analysis. Of the various evaluation models, peer review is widely used, suitable and effective, to guarantee the quality of research work. On this basis, the paper introduces the status and current development of peer review as an evaluation model, discusses the rules and potential rules in the work including the points of authority and anonymity to shed light on the making of policies concerning scientific research.