期刊文献+

中文版Roland-Morris腰痛失能问卷可靠性评定 被引量:33

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评定中文版Roland-Morris问卷(RMQ)的可靠性。方法:将英文原版RMQ翻译成中文、并回译,拟定RMQ中文版。应用中文版RMQ共对57名腰痛患者评价进行可靠性评定。间隔1周复测。对其中32名患者给予非甾体类抗炎药物治疗2周。结果:回译一致率为96%。重测简单相关系数r为0.90,组内相关系数ICC为0.95。Cronbach'α系数为0.84。中文版RMQ与中文版Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)(r=0.81,P<0.001)、视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAS)(r=0.78,P<0.001)评价结果均呈明显的相关性。治疗前后,中文版RMQ评分存在明显差异(P<0.001)。结论:本研究表明,中文版RMQ具有很好的信度、效度及较高的敏感度,是一种可靠的腰痛失能评价方法。
出处 《实用医学杂志》 CAS 2005年第24期2755-2756,共2页 The Journal of Practical Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1贺石生,侯铁胜.腰痛患者的功能评估[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2002,12(6):445-447. 被引量:11
  • 2Padua R, Padua L, Ceccarelli E, et al. Italian version of the Roland Disability Questionnaire, specific for low back pain: cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Eur Spine J, 2002, 11(2): 126 - 129.
  • 3Yoshimi Suzukamo, Shuniehi Fukuhara, Shiniehi Kikuehi, et al.Validation of the Japanese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. J Orthop Sci, 2003, 8(4):543-548.
  • 4Ismail Bejia, Mohamed Younes, Ben Sallem Kamel, et al. Validation of the Tunisian version of the Roland-Morris questionnaire. Eur Spine J, 2005, 14(2): 171-174.
  • 5Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine,2000, 25(24): 3186-3191.
  • 6郑光新,赵晓鸥,刘广林,张利峰.Oswestry功能障碍指数评定腰痛患者的可信性[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2002,12(1):13-15. 被引量:552

二级参考文献26

  • 1[2]Greenough CG, Fraser RD. Assessment of outcome in patients with low back pain[J].Spine, 1992,17:36-41.
  • 2[3]Ruta DA, Garratt AM, Wardlaw D, et al.Developing a valid and reliable measure of health outcome for patients with low back pain[J].Spine, 1994,19:1887-1896.
  • 3[4]Manniche C,Asmussen K,Lauritsen B,et al. Low Back Pain Rating Scale: validation of a tool for assessment of low back pain[J].Pain, 1994,57:317-326.
  • 4[5]Kopec JA, Esdile JM, Abrahamowicz M, et al. The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: conceptualization and development [J].J Clin Epidemiol, 1996,49:151-161.
  • 5[6]Waddell G, Main CJ. Assessment of severity in low back disorders[J].Spine,1984,9:204-208.
  • 6[7]Daltroy LH, Cats-Baril WL, Katz JN,et al.The North American Spine Society lumbar spine outcome assessment instrument: reliability and validity tests[J]. Spine, 1996,21:741-749.
  • 7[8]Williams RM, Myers AM. A new approach to measuring recovery in injured workers with acute low back pain:Resumption of activities of daily living scale [J].Phys Ther, 1998,78:613-623.
  • 8[9]Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain:Part Ⅰ Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain[J].Spine,1983,8:141-144.
  • 9[10]Leclaire R, Blier F, Fortin L,et al. A cross-sectional study comparing the Oswestry and Roland-Morris functional disability scales in two populations of patients with low back pain of different levels of severity[J].Spine,1997,22:68 -71.
  • 10[11]Roland M, Fairbank J. The RolandMorris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disablity Questionnaire[J].Spine, 2000,25(24): 3115-3124.

共引文献560

同被引文献438

引证文献33

二级引证文献403

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部