摘要
目的:观察动脉导管未闭(PDA)导管封堵与外科缝扎术对心率、血压的影响。方法:119例PDA患者中62 例做外科缝扎手术,57例做Amplatzer封堵器封堵。观察术前、术后其心率、血压的变化情况。结果:(1)对心率 的影响:手术组:术前、后有明显差异(P<0.05);介入组:术前、后没有明显差异(P>0.05)。两组术前没有明 显差异(P>0.05).术后介入组心率明显低于手术组(P<0.05);(2)对血压影响:两组术前、后收缩压与舒张压 均无显著性差异(P>0.05)。两组间术前收缩压及舒张压无显著性差异(P>0.05),但术后均出现显著性差异(P< 0.05)。结论:手术组术后心率增快比介入组明显。介入组术后收缩压和舒张压明显比手术组高。
Objective: To evaluate the effects on heart rate and blood pressure between transeatheter occlusion with Amaplatzer oeeluder device and traditional surgical process for patent duetus arterious (PDA). Methods: In 119 PDA cases, 62 cases were suffered the traditional surgical process (TSP group) and 57 cases were suffered transeatheter occlusion (TCO group). Results: (1) The effect on heart rate: There was obvious difference between pre-operation and post-operation in TSP group (P〈0.05) ; and there was no obvious differences between pre-operation and post-operation in TCO group (P〉0.05). The heart rate was not obvious difference before operation (P〉0.05), but occurred obvious differences after operation (P〈0.05) between two groups; (2) The effect on blood pressure: In TSP group there were not obvious differences of systole and diastole pressure (SBP, DBP) during pre-operation and post-operation (P〉0.05) and as well as the TCO group. There were no obvious differences before operation (P〉0.05), but occurred obvious differences after operation (P〈0.05) between two groups. Conclusion: After operation the heart rate higher and SBP, DBP lower than group of transeatheter occlusion process in group of traditional surgical.
出处
《心血管康复医学杂志》
CAS
2005年第6期548-549,共2页
Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词
动脉导管未闭
外科手术
心脏导管插入术
心率
血压
Patent duetus arterious
Surgery
Heart catheterization
Heart rate
Blood pressure