摘要
法律真实论与客观真实论的学术争议,使法学研究长期忽视的认识论受到关注。法律真实论从一开始就没有呈现出清晰的面貌,但它渲染的某些观点对司法者追求案件真相的内在动力产生了消解作用,这种消解作用主要是由它在能否发现客观真实和应否发现客观真实两大问题上提出的与客观真实论的不同见解产生的。
The academic controversies about legal truth theory and objective truth theory enables the long- ignored legal research to be attended. Legal truth theory have an ambiguous face, but its several opinions play a role in reducing judicial functionary' s inherent motivity to establish the truth in criminal investigation and trial. Such reducing function originated from the opinions that are different from objective truth theory. Those opinions are about whether objective truth can be found or whether objective truth should be found.
出处
《政法论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第6期122-137,共16页
Tribune of Political Science and Law