期刊文献+

^(18)F-FDGPET延迟显像在肿瘤诊断中的价值 被引量:3

Value of Dual-Phase ^(18)F-FDG PET in Diagnosis of Tumor
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨双时相^(18)F-FDG PET显像图像、标准摄取值(SUV)及储留指数(RI%)在恶性肿瘤诊断中的价值。方法对104例疑患恶性肿瘤者及59例体检者进行^(18)F-FDG PET全身扫描,有局灶性代谢增高的患者经饮水、进食后3h进行延迟显像,用勾划感兴趣区方法计算两次显像的SUV,并计算^(18)F-FDG的RI%。随访其手术病理结果、治疗转归及再次CT/MR检查结果,综合比较^(18)F-FDG及RI%对恶性肿瘤诊断的应用效果。结果56例患者40min显像有局灶性代谢增高病灶;经3h延迟显像后发现病灶形态发生较大改变或病灶消失,综合分析为生理性代谢增高。其余107例共发现128个可疑病灶,以在40min时SUV≥3为标准,判断恶性诊断的灵敏度、特异性、准确性分别为80.3%、90.7%、84.2%;以^(18)F-FDG在病灶中的RI%≥10%作为标准,灵敏度、特异性、准确性分别为72.8%、78.9%、80.3%。结合以上两项标准,恶性肿瘤诊断灵敏度、特异性、准确性分别为100%、98.4%、98.4%。结论3h延迟显像对肿瘤诊断有辅助作用,结合应用最大SUV及RI%两项指标可提高诊断准确率。 Objective To study the value of dual-phase ^18F -FDG PET imaging, standardized uptake value(SUV) and retention index( RI% ) in the diagnosis of malignancy. Methods One hundred and sixty-three persons were enrolled, among them 104 persons were suspected with malignant tumor, 59 persons were physical examination. Forty minutes after injection of ^18F -FDG, a whole body scan was performed,while the delayed imaging was performed 3 h after injection. SUV was calculated with delineated ROI method for each image, and retention index ( RI% ) was also calculated. Operation,pathology therapeutic result and repeated CT/MR were follow up. The diagnostic value of SUV and RI% for malignancy was analyzed. Results Focal high metabolic loci was found. In 56 cases at 40 min image, the lesion morphology change greatly or disappeared at delay image and was considered as physiological high uptake. The remaining 107 cases were revealed 128 doubtful lesions. Take SUV ≥3 as stand, the sensitivity, speciality and accuracy of malignancy was 72.8% , 78.9% and 80.3% respectively. Take RI% ≥ 10% as standard, the sensitivity, speciality and accuracy of malignancy was 72.8% ,78.9% and 80.3%. When combining these two indexes as standard, the sensitivity, speciality and accuracy of malignancy was 100% ,98.4% and 98.4% respectively. Conclusion Combining SUV and RI% in dual-phase imaging, it can improve the accuracy in the diagnosis of malignancy.
出处 《上海第二医科大学学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2005年第12期1257-1259,共3页 Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Secondae Shanghai
关键词 PET 标准摄取值 储留指数 肿瘤 诊断 PET standardized uptake value residual index tumor diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1van Westreenen HL,Pmkker JT,Cobben DC,et al.Prognestic value of the stardanlized uptake value in esophageal cancer[J].Am J Boentgenol,2005,185(2):436-440.
  • 2Bors GR,Belderbos JS,Boel nard R,et al.Standardised FDG uptake:A prognostic factor for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer[J].Eur J Cancer,2005,41(11):1533.
  • 3Kim TY,Kim WR,Ryr JS,et al.^18F-fluorodeoxyglacose uptake in thyroid from positron emission tomogram(PET)for evaluation in cancer patients:high prevalence of malignancy in thyroid PET incidentaloma[J].Earyngoscope,2005,115(6):1074-1078.
  • 4Deneoke T,Rau B,Hoffmano KT,et al.Comparison of CT,MRI and FDG-PET in response predietion of patients with locelly acvanced rectal cancer after mulimodal preoperative theropy:Is there a heaefit in using functional imaging[J].Eur Radiol,2005,15(8):1658.
  • 5Lin WY,Tsal SC,Hung GU.Value of delayed ^18F-FDG-PET imaging in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Nucl Med Commun,2005,26(4):315-321.
  • 6Khan N,Oriuchi N,Yoshizaki A,et al.Diaznostic accuracy of FDG PET imaging for the detertion of recurrent on metastatic gynecologic cancer[J].Ann Nucl Med,2005,19(2):137-145.
  • 7Dobert N,Hamscho N,Menzel C,et al.Limitations of cual true point FDG-PET imaging inth evaluation of foeal abdominal lesions[J].Nuklearmedixin,2004,43(5):143-149.
  • 8Hung GU,Tsai SC,Lin WY.Extraordirarily high ^18F-FDG uptake caused by radiation necrosis in a patient with nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J].Clin Nucl Med,2005,30(8):558-559.

同被引文献31

  • 1孙晓光,修雁,刘建军,施一平,万良荣,黄钢.口服造影剂对胃肠道^(18)F-FDG摄取的研究[J].上海第二医科大学学报,2005,25(12):1253-1256. 被引量:7
  • 2于金明,陈少卿.功能影像和生物靶区:实验与临床研究进展[J].中国癌症杂志,2006,16(6):443-447. 被引量:6
  • 3Imperiale A,Cimarelli S,Sellem DB,et al.Focal 18F-FDG uptake mimicking malignant gastric localizations disappearing after water ingestion on PET/CT images[J].Clin Nucl Med,2006,31(12):835-837.
  • 4Veit-Haibach P,Kuehle C,Beyer T,et al.Diagnostic accuracy of colorectal cancer staging with whole-body PET/CT colonography[J].JAMA,2006,296(21):2590-2600.
  • 5Israel O,Yefremov N,Bar-Shalom R,et al.PET/CT detection of unexpected gastrointestinal foci of 18F-FDG uptake:incidence,localization patterns,and clinical significance[J].J Nucl Med,2005,46(5):758-762.
  • 6Kolesnikov-Gauthier H,Levy E,Merlet P,et al.FDG PET in patients with cancer of an unknown primary[J].Nucl Med Commun,2005,26(12):1059-1066.
  • 7Gollub MJ,Akhurst T,Markowitz AJ,et al.Combined CT colonography and 18F-FDG PET of colon polyps:potential technique for selective detection of cancer and precancerous lesions[J].AJR,2007,188(1):130-138.
  • 8Meller J,Sahlmann CO,Scheel AK.18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in fever of unknown origin[J].J Nucl Med,2007,48(1):35-45.
  • 9van Waarde A,Cobben DC,Suurmeijer AJ,et al.Selectivity of 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG for differentiating tumor from inflammation in a rodent model[J].J Nucl Med,2004,45(4):695-700.
  • 10Gregory MMV,Andrew DV. Handbook of treatment planning in ra- diation oneology [ M ]. NY : Odyssey Press lnc, 2010 : 2 - 5.

引证文献3

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部