期刊文献+

甲芬那酸分散片在健康人体的生物等效性评价 被引量:4

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of mefenamic acid dispersible tablets in health volunteers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究甲芬那酸分散片和普通片在健康人体的药动学特征和生物等效性。方法:采用标准两周期交叉设计自身对照试验方法,18名健康志愿者单剂量口服500mg甲芬那酸分散片或普通片,用反相高效液相色谱法(RP-HPLC)测定血清中甲芬那酸的浓度,计算其药动学参数并评价两种制剂的生物等效性。结果:甲芬那酸分散片和普通片的主要药动学参数Tmax(实测值)分别为(1.1±0.6)h和(2.1±0.8)h,Cmax(实测值)分别为(5.8±2.2)mg.L-1和(5.9±3.0)mg.L-1,AUC(0-14h)分别为(18.1±3.4)mg.L-1.h和(17.3±5.0)mg.L-1.h,AUC(0-inf)分别为(18.7±3.3)mg.L-1.h和(18.0±4.9)mg.L-1.h,T1/2Ke分别为(2.0±0.8)h和(2.3±1.2)h。除Tmax外,甲芬那酸分散片和普通片各主要药动学参数间差异无显著性(P>0.05);甲芬那酸分散片对普通片的相对生物利用度为(111.3±31.9)%。结论:健康人单剂量口服500mg甲芬那酸分散片与普通片具有生物等效性。 OBJECTIVE To study the pharrnacokinetics and bioequivalence of mefenamic acid dispersible tablets and mefenamic acid tablets. METHODS Mefenamic acid dispersible tablets and mefenamic acid tablets were given to 18 health volunteers in an open randomized two period cross-over test single oral dose 500 mg. The serum levels of mefenamic acid were measured by reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography(RP-HPLC). RESULTS The pharmacokinetic parameters of mefenamic acid dispersible tablets and mefenamic acid tablets were as follows: Tmax were (1.1 ± 0. 6)h and (2. 1 ± 0. 8)h, Cmax were (5. 8 ± 2. 2)mg, L^-1 and (5. 9 ± 3. 0)mg.L^-1 , AUC(0-14h) were (18. 1 ±3. 4)mg.L^-1 ·h and (17. 3 ± 5. 0)mg.L^-1·h, AUC(0-∞) were (18. 7 ± 3.3)mg.L^-1·h and (18.0 ± 4. 9) mg·L^-1·h, T1/2Ke were ( 2. 0 ± 0. 8) h and (2.3 ± 1.2) h. Exception of Tmax, the statistical analysis for AUC(0-14h), AUC(0-inf) and Cmax showed that there was no significant difference between mefenamic acid dispersible tablets and mefenamic acid tablets(P〉0. 05). The relative bioavailability of mefenamic acid tablets was (111.3 ± 31.9)%. CONCLUSION The two preparations of mefenamic acid were bioequivalent.
出处 《中国医院药学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第11期1013-1016,共4页 Chinese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy
关键词 甲芬那酸 药动学 高效液相色谱法 生物等效性 mefenamic acid HPLC pharmacokinetics bioequivalence
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Lethaby A,Augood C,Duckitt K. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for heavy menstrual bleeding[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2002, (1): CD000400.
  • 2AL-Waili NS. Treatment of menstrual migraine with prostaglandin synthesis inhibitor mefenamic acid: double-blind study with placebo[J]. Eur J Med Res,2000,19, 5(4):176~182.
  • 3文爱东,赵磊,张三奇,蒋永培,樊亚萱,杨志福.阿莫西林·克拉维酸钾片在健康志愿者体内的相对生物等效性[J].第四军医大学学报,2001,22(19):1805-1808. 被引量:15
  • 4文爱东,杨志福,赵磊,高迎春,李薇.酶联免疫法与微粒子酶免疫法检测全血他克莫司浓度的比较[J].中国医院药学杂志,2002,22(6):346-348. 被引量:11
  • 5Rouini MR, Asadipour A, Ardakani YH, et al. Liquid chromatography method for determination of mefenamic acid in human serum[J]. Journal of Chromatography B, 2004,800 (1~2): 189~192.
  • 6Ruiz TP, Lozano CM, Tomás V, et al. Analysis of binary mixtures of flufenamic, meclofenamic and mefenamic acids by derivative synchronous fluorescence spectrometry[J]. Talanta, 1998,47(3):537~545.
  • 7Pérez-Ruiz T, Martínez-Lozano C,SanzA,et al. Determination of flufenamic, meclofenamic and mefenamic acids by capillary electrophoresis using β-cyclodextrin[J]. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl, 1998,708(1~2):249~256.
  • 8陈鹰,匡长春,宋琪,汤韧,韩勇.分散片的研究与应用[J].中国药师,2001,4(1):62-64. 被引量:41
  • 9Mikami E, Goto T, Ohno T, et al. Simultaneous analysis of anthranilic acid derivatives in pharmaceuticals and human urine by high performance liquid chromatography with isocratic elution[J].J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl, 2000, 744(1) :81~89.
  • 10Rescigno A, Marzo A, thyroff-friesinger U. Mefenamic acid equivalence assessment with a new statistical procedure[J]. Pharmacol Res, 1996,34(3~4): 149~152.

二级参考文献30

  • 1王孟琴,田淑媛.钾镁分散片的研制及临床观察[J].西北药学杂志,1994,9(4):175-176. 被引量:2
  • 2罗云,马红斌,蔡鸿生.扑热息痛分散片制备及质量控制[J].现代应用药学,1996,13(3):34-35. 被引量:4
  • 3王卓,韩丽梅,张晓青,邓英杰,张艳华,王越.利用均匀设计筛选阿司匹林分散片处方[J].沈阳药科大学学报,1996,13(4):235-239. 被引量:18
  • 4[1]Jiang H,Kobayashi M.Differences between cyclosporine A and tacrolimus in organ transplantation [J].Transplant Proc,1999,31:1978.
  • 5[2]Ihor B,Dawna D,Qais A.Effect of low-and high-fat meals on tacrolimus absorption following 5 mg single oral doses to healthy human subjects[J].J Clin Pharmacol,2001,41:176.
  • 6[3]Macfarlane GD,Scheller D,Ersfeld BF,et al.Analytical characterization of the PRO-TracⅡELISA for the determination of tacrolimus in whole blood[J].Ther Drug Monit,1997,19:559.
  • 7[4]Kempe K,Densmore G,Macfarlane GD,et al.Comparison lf the lmx MEIA and PRO-Trac Ⅱ ELISA assays for the determination of tacrolimus in whole blood[J].Clinical Chemistry,1997,43:S205.
  • 8[5]Murthy JN,Chen Y,Warty VS,et al.Radioreceptor assay for quantifying FK506 immunosuppressant in whole blood[J].Clin Chem 1992,38:1307.
  • 9[6]Macfarlane GD,SchellerDG,Ersfeld DL,et al.Analytical validation lf the PRO_Trac ⅡELIsA for the determination of tacrolimus (FK506)in whole blood[J].Clin Chem,1999,45(9)L1449.
  • 10[7]Murthy JN,Davis DL,Yatscoff RW,et al.Tacrolimus metabolite cross-reactivity in different tacrlimus assays[J].Clin Biochem,1998,31(8):L613.

共引文献61

同被引文献2160

引证文献4

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部