期刊文献+

中美语言政策和规划对比研究及启示 被引量:16

A Contrast Study in LPP Between China and US and Its Implications
下载PDF
导出
摘要 语言政策和语言规划是社会语言学研究的重要内容。语言政策和规划的基本理论,就中国和美国两个大国的语言政策和规划作较详细的对比,对比主要从民族语言、外语和双语教育几个方面入手。对我国的语言政策和规划,特别是对我国的外语教育政策和规划有一定的参考意义。 Language policy and language planning (LPP) is an indispensable section in sociolinguistics. This paper first elaborates the basic theories of LPP and then makes a detailed contrast in LPP between China and the United States in terms of national languages, foreign languages and bilingual education. Based on the contrast and analysis,we come to several conclusions and implications, which can be of some significance to the LPP in China, especially to the foreign language education policy and planning in China.
作者 胡明勇 雷卿
出处 《三峡大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 2005年第6期89-93,共5页 Journal of China Three Gorges University(Humanities & Social Sciences)
关键词 语言政策和规划 民族语言 外语 双语教育 language planning and policy national languages foreign languages bilingual education
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1[1]Bright W,et al.International encyclopedia of linguistics,vol.4[C].New York:Oxford University Press,1992.310~311.
  • 2[2]Cooper R L.Language planning and social change[M].Landon:Cambridge University Press,1989.31~32.
  • 3[3]Wiley T G.Language planning and policy[A].S.L McKay & N.H Hornberger.Sociolinguistics and Language Teaching[C].Shanghai:Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press,2001.
  • 4[4]Daoust D.Language planning and language reform[A].F.Coulmas.The Handbook of Sociolinguistics[C].Being:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press,2001.441~445.
  • 5林勇,宋金芳.语言经济学评述[J].经济学动态,2004(3):65-68. 被引量:29
  • 6[6]Lewelling V W.Official English and English Plus:An update.ERIC Digest May.1997.Clearinghouse on Language and Linguistics Washington DC[EB/OL].http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2/content_storage_01/0000000b/80/2a/28/58.pdf.
  • 7[7]Phillipson R.Linguistic Imperialism[M].Shanghai:Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press,2000.
  • 8胡壮麟.论中国的双语教育[J].中国外语,2004,1(2):4-8. 被引量:190
  • 9胡文仲.我国外语教育规划的得与失[J].外语教学与研究,2001,33(4):245-251. 被引量:236

二级参考文献28

  • 1道布.中国的语言政策和语言规划[J].民族研究,1998(6):42-52. 被引量:34
  • 2普忠良.一些国家的语言立法及政策述略[J].民族语文,2000(2):71-76. 被引量:16
  • 3Ager, D. 1996. Language Policy in Britain and France: The Processes of Policy [M]. Cassell.
  • 4Beardsmore,H. B. 1994. Language policy and planning in western European countries [J]. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (1993/1994) 14: 93-110.
  • 5Cenoz, J. F. & Genesee 1998. (eds.). BeyondBilin gualism:Multilingualism and Multilingual Education [M]. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • 6Cooper, R.L. 1989. Language Planning and Social Change [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 7Gonzalez,A. 1998. Teaching in two or more languages in the Philippine context [A]. In Jasone Cenoz and Fred Genesee 1998. Pp. 192-205.
  • 8Graddol, D. 1997. The Future of English? [M]London:British Council.
  • 9Hoffmann, C. 1996. (ed.). Language, Culture and Communication in Contemporary Europe [M].Clevedon:Multilingual Matters.
  • 10McKay, S. & N. Homberger 1996. (eds.). Sociolinguistics and Language Teaching [M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

共引文献449

同被引文献114

引证文献16

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部