期刊文献+

惊恐障碍患者威斯康星卡片分类测验和连续操作测验的对照研究 被引量:11

Wisconsin card sorting test and continue performance test in patients with panic disorder
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨惊恐障碍患者的执行功能和注意功能。方法采用威斯康星分类卡片测验(WCST)和连续操作测验(CPT),对47名惊恐障碍患者和37名健康对照者的执行功能和注意功能进行评估。结果在WCST中,惊恐障碍患者组的总测验次数和随机错误数[分别为(76.9±28.9)次和(30.5±21.9)次]高于正常对照组[分别为(64.1±26.1)次和(18.7±15.6)次(均P<0.05)];正确反应数和分类数[分别为(24.1±2.8)次和(4.8±0.6)次]均少于对照组[分别为(25.0±0.0)次和(5.0±0.0)次](P<0.05~0.01);持续错误数[(22.3±12.1)次]与对照组[(20.4±12.9)次]相比,差异无显著性(P>0.05)。惊恐障碍患者组CPT四项指标[CPT、CPT1、CPT2和CPT3分别为(30.3±4.2)次、(10.4±2.2)次、(9.2±1.9)次和(10.6±1.4)次]与对照组[CPT、CPT1、CPT2和CPT3分别为(31.0±2.2)次、(10.7±0.8)次、(9.2±1.7)次和(10.9±0.3)次]间的差异无显著性(P>0.05)。结论惊恐障碍患者可能存在执行功能缺陷,而注意功能未受损害。 Objective To explore the executive and attention function of patients with panic disorder. Methods 47 patients with panic disorder and 37 normal controls were used the Wisconsin Card Sorting test (WCST) and Continue performance test (CPT) to study the executive and attention function. Results Compared with the controls ( total trials were 64. 1 ± 26. 1, random errors were 18.7 ± 15.6, categories were 5.0 ± 0.0, correct trials were 25.0 ± 0.0, perseverative errors were 20.4 ± 12.9, respectively), total trials and random errors ( 76.9 ± 28.9 and 30.5 ± 21.9, respectively)of patients increased, categories and correct trials (4.8 ± 0.6 and 24. 1 ± 2.8, respectively) decreased ( all P 〈 0.05 ) , but perseverative errors ( 22.3 ± 12. l ) were not changed ( P 〉 0.05 ). As to the CPT, there was no significant difference between patients and controls( CPT = 30.3 ±4.2 and 31.0 ± 2.2,respectively) ( P〉 0.05 ). Conclusion Patients with panic disorder may have executive function impairments and no attention impairments.
出处 《中国行为医学科学》 CSCD 2005年第12期1077-1078,共2页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science
基金 深圳市科技局三项经费资助项目(200004035)
关键词 惊恐障碍 执行功能 注意功能 Panic disorder Executive Attention
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献58

  • 1汪向东.心理卫生评定量表手册[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1993,:202-209.
  • 2Heaton RK. Wisconsin card sorting test manual. Florida:Psychological Assessment Resources Inc, 1998. 39-52.
  • 3Yager J, Gitlin MJ. Clinical Manifestation of Psychiatric Disorders.Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry. 7th ed. New York:Kaplan & Sadock′s, 2000. 789-790.
  • 4Egan MF, Goldberg TE, Gscheidle T, et al. Relative risk of attention deficits in siblings of patients with schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry, 2000. 157 : 1309-1316.
  • 5Egan MF, Goldbeg TE, Gscheidle T, et al. Relative risk for cognitive impairments in siblings of patients with schizophrenia.Biol Psychiatry, 2001, 50:98-107.
  • 6Chen WJ, Hsiao CK, Hsiao LL, et al. Performance of the Continuous Performance Test among community samples. Schizophr Bull, 1998, 24:163-174.
  • 7Merriam EP, Thase MF, Haas GL. et al: Prefrontal cortical dysfunction in depression determined by Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance. Am J Psychiatry, 1999, 156:780 - 782.
  • 8Yager J, Gitlin MJ. Clinical Manifestation of Psychiatric Disorders. Comprehensive Textbook d Psychiatry'. 7. New York: Kaplan &Sadock' s 2000, 789 - 790.
  • 9Egan MF, Goldberg TE, Gscheidle T, et al. Relative risk of attention deficits in siblings of patients with schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry, 2000, 157: 1309- 1316.
  • 10Egan MF, Golctberg TE, Gscheidle T, et al. Relative risk for cognitive impairments in siblings of patients with schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry, 2001, 50: 98- 107.

共引文献64

同被引文献127

引证文献11

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部